Lofty
Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2007
- Messages
- 1,583
- Location
- Gainesville, Florida
- WCA ID
- 2008LOFT01
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
So I have been practicing Petrus for a little bit and having abandoned the idea of learning ZBLL I was looking at other alternatives for LL methods taking advantage of the benefits of step 3 but requiring fewer algs.
Has it seems to flow well with what I love (OH cubing) and is mostly RU algs. Of course I know it can be 100% RU but for the sake of much lower move counts it isn't always.
I seems to be better then just the standard OCLL+PLL. But how is F2LL compared to COLL+EPLL? I could always do COLL if it is a separated pair for step 4b or F2LL if it is a connected pair for my Petrus solving. Any thoughts on the variation?
Has it seems to flow well with what I love (OH cubing) and is mostly RU algs. Of course I know it can be 100% RU but for the sake of much lower move counts it isn't always.
I seems to be better then just the standard OCLL+PLL. But how is F2LL compared to COLL+EPLL? I could always do COLL if it is a separated pair for step 4b or F2LL if it is a connected pair for my Petrus solving. Any thoughts on the variation?