Which detailed method do you use?

[jms_gears1]

i like how its just roux(any form)
its because roux is just plain pwn right?

 

[shelley]

XG ftw

I know three or four Winter Variation algs and apparently that's enough to qualify me as knowing Winter Variation?

 

[sub_zero1983]

I use F2L imcomplete oll + pll. I currently learning Full OLL and PLL

 

[Tomk]

Intuitive F2L with a couple of algs for difficult cases, incomplete OLL and Full PLL.

 

[waffle=ijm]

Roux
any form made me lol

 

[Rook]

Fridrich F2L

Incomplete OLL. Maybe about 20 of them learnt

19 PLL's. I need to get around to learning the N Perms, but they don't show up enough for me to make a big deal out of it. I also want to use some better PLL's (for example, the R/U version of the Z-Perm instead of the M/U one)

 

[Forte]

XG ftw

I know three or four Winter Variation algs and apparently that's enough to qualify me as knowing Winter Variation?

Yeah I thought that was odd as well.

 

[miniGOINGS]

Apparently ZZ isn't a method.

I noticed too, I guess I'll go with Roux then.

 

[Cyrus C.]

Currently using Fridrich. Cross, F2L, OLL, PLL. But I'm learning MGLS. Cross, 3/4 F2L, ELS, CLS, PLL.

 

[rubiknewbie]

XG ftw

I know three or four Winter Variation algs and apparently that's enough to qualify me as knowing Winter Variation?

Yeah I thought that was odd as well.

You need to use them in speedsolving to qualify. Like I started learning around 4 algorithms but have not started using any so I consider myself not knowing it .

 

[Forte]

XG ftw

I know three or four Winter Variation algs and apparently that's enough to qualify me as knowing Winter Variation?

Yeah I thought that was odd as well.

You need to use them in speedsolving to qualify. Like I started learning around 4 algorithms but have not started using any so I consider myself not knowing it .

But . . . knowing and using 3 out of 27 still isn't much of a qualification.

 

[rubiknewbie]

XG ftw

I know three or four Winter Variation algs and apparently that's enough to qualify me as knowing Winter Variation?

Yeah I thought that was odd as well.

You need to use them in speedsolving to qualify. Like I started learning around 4 algorithms but have not started using any so I consider myself not knowing it .

But . . . knowing and using 3 out of 27 still isn't much of a qualification.

Because so few people appears to be using Winter Variation gotta loosen the criteria to give them some advantage . Even with this there are only 3 people selecting Winter Variation.

 

[ostracod]

Yes, I support loosening the criteria for WV. Think of """all""" the ZZ solvers who use it.

PS- I am not dead yet!

 

[rubiknewbie]

So 4 more people.
http://www.speedsolving.com/forum/showthread.php?t=16971

 

[miniGOINGS]

Yes, I support loosening the criteria for WV. Think of """all""" the ZZ solvers who use it.

PS- I am not dead yet!

I've been thinking about that.

 

[JTW2007]

-Cross on green, no color neutrality
-Fridrich F2L + a little multislotting, MGLS, LL control, empty slot stuff, etc.
-2-look OLL (which Dan Dzoan will never let me off the hook for)
-Full PLL with a few cases learned from multiple directions

I should learn some OLL.

 

[Logan]

- Any cross color
- beginner F2L or Keyhole (depending on which works better) or fridrich F2L (rarely)
- 2-look OLL
- mixture of 2-look and fridrich ( i know both A perms, both J perms,both U perms, T, Z, and H perms (rest is 2-look))

I avg about 33 sec.

 

[Anthony]

-2-look OLL (which Dan Dzoan will never let me off the hook for)

I should learn some OLL.

Jackson still hasn't finished learning OLL?
I'm team Dzoan on this matter. Get to work.

 

[JTW2007]

-2-look OLL (which Dan Dzoan will never let me off the hook for)

I should learn some OLL.

Jackson still hasn't finished learning OLL?
I'm team Dzoan on this matter. Get to work.

I only know something like 16 cases. I should become the fastest 2-look user.