What if puzzle solving competed like other sports?

unirox13

Veteran
Joined
Oct 12, 2010
Messages
652
I've never been to or competed in a speedsolving event (bucket list for sure lol). However, it's one of the few competitive events that allows one to bring their preferred tools. Golf, tennis, Pickleball, are a few others that come up immediately. You can bring your own balls and clubs, your own rackets. However what if cubing turned more towards the world of American football, soccer, baseball or even chess. You have to compete using the provided props.

How much do you think the world record would vary if every competitor was required to use the same prop as the others? Do you think that it would change your likeliness to attend or compete if you knew that you'd be using Rubik's Speed 3x3 for your competition time, as well as your competitors? Do you think that it would change the puzzles that you use at home and train with?

Obviously a thought that will likely never come to fruition, however it is still interesting to think about, you must admit.
 
If multi blind was like golf, I'd be the world record holder
I'm not saying the scrambles, just the prop. You'd still get a different scramble for every step along the way. However you would only be using the props provided by the event organizers. Howabout a V-Cube event. You must use their puzzle for every event. The scramble is different depending on the event, but the puzzle is the same for every competitor.
It would change your training, would it not?
 
it used to work like that actually but i dont really think its a good idea since you can setup your cube in MANY different ways
Agreed. I don't think that it's a good idea, just a interesting one. Obviously they don't make the skaters in the X-games use the same board because they want them to do their best. Just as speedsolvers want each other to do their best.
I just think that in the twisty puzzle world it's a unique concept. You go to a V-Cube competition knowing that you'll only be using their puzzles, you'd likely train differently. You'd probably learn things slower and more fluently.
Obviously it's just a thought, I just wanted to see the thoughts and opinions of young speedsolvers on this forum. (because we must admit that quite a few of the members of this forum are younger folks.)
 
I've never been to or competed in a speedsolving event (bucket list for sure lol). However, it's one of the few competitive events that allows one to bring their preferred tools. Golf, tennis, Pickleball, are a few others that come up immediately. You can bring your own balls and clubs, your own rackets. However what if cubing turned more towards the world of American football, soccer, baseball or even chess. You have to compete using the provided props.

How much do you think the world record would vary if every competitor was required to use the same prop as the others? Do you think that it would change your likeliness to attend or compete if you knew that you'd be using Rubik's Speed 3x3 for your competition time, as well as your competitors? Do you think that it would change the puzzles that you use at home and train with?

Obviously a thought that will likely never come to fruition, however it is still interesting to think about, you must admit.
In baseball, the only thing "provided" are the balls. They are provided by the home team but the umpires put mud on them and prepare them. All other equipment that is not playing surface-related is provided by the players/teams.

In American football, each team provides all their own equipment, including footballs.
 
I think that the sport that WCA comps relate to the most is Track and Field. Hear me out:
The sprint events: 2x2, pyra, skewb, squan and 3x3 for cubing, and 100, 200, 400, 800? in track.
Middle distance: 4x4, 5x5, mega for cubing. 800?, 1600 and the 3200 for track.
Long distance: 6x6 and 7x7 for cubing: and 3200-10K for track.
As for ultra long distances (marathons, ultra marathons, etc.) the only events that could compare are multi-bld, 4bld and 5bld, but I'm really thinking of the main puzzle events, and not any special categories.
Of course, there are restrictive runs (race walking, ambulatory/wheelchair races, etc.) But those are special by themselves, so what I'm trying to drive home is how similar the main puzzle events we have are close to track.
However, there are some main key differences between them:
1. In cubing, even if you have your own main events, you can still compete in other events w/out tiring out too much. In track, you're either a sprinter, long distance runner, hurdler, thrower, etc. And you aren't really going to see a sprinter doing the 3200m, or a thrower doing pole vault. They will typically stay within their main events for most meets, unless the coaches want them to try something else.
Basically what I'm trying to say here is that it's hard to do multiple events at a track meet. There are exceptions, like people who can throw down a 1600, 800, 3200 and a 4x400, or people that can do something obscure like a 1600m, 300m hurdles and a 4x400 or 300m hurdles and a 3200m run (totally not me lol). However, you usually see a distance runner do like the 1600 and the 800/1600 and the 3200, or a thrower doing discus shot and jav.
2. Cubing is a solitary sport. Sure, you can cube with friends, but you aren't going to be doing the same "workout" as another cuber, or compete in the same team in a comp. In track you warm up with the whole team in the beginner, break off to your event type, and run/sprint/lift with the people that have the same or similar event types as you. I wish that cubing had more of a team system, so that you can form a team with some other cubers, since cubing relies heavily on the teachings of others to be able to learn new things. And even if you discovered things on your own, you'd want to share them with others since we're all nice people deep down (I hope).
3. Coaching is different. In cubing you usually learn from videos online or from tips that people give you from critiqued solves. However, in track, the coaches will kind of strip down everything from form to speed to the competitions. They really push you to do your best at the meet, tell you when you need to chill at practice, you get rewarded along the way by knowing you did well at practice or a meet. They also push you try to do events you'd never normally do, or try to keep you in one event since they see potential in that ability. Within cubing, this is hard since you might be a guy that does nxns all the time and you don't really want to branch out to anything else. However, if you give them a try you might find something that you really like. That's how I got into mega, and in track, how I got into doing 300 hurdles.
So that's my rant about the similarities in track and cubing. I hope you found something interesting here, and add on.
Peace.
 
I've never been to or competed in a speedsolving event (bucket list for sure lol). However, it's one of the few competitive events that allows one to bring their preferred tools. Golf, tennis, Pickleball, are a few others that come up immediately. You can bring your own balls and clubs, your own rackets. However what if cubing turned more towards the world of American football, soccer, baseball or even chess. You have to compete using the provided props.

How much do you think the world record would vary if every competitor was required to use the same prop as the others? Do you think that it would change your likeliness to attend or compete if you knew that you'd be using Rubik's Speed 3x3 for your competition time, as well as your competitors? Do you think that it would change the puzzles that you use at home and train with?

Obviously a thought that will likely never come to fruition, however it is still interesting to think about, you must admit.
At least for 1982 Worlds, cubing was just as you described, but we (rightfully so, imho) moved away from it.
In (Association) Football the ammount of self-provided "materials" changes a lot from competition to competition.
As track and fields was also mentioned, in pole vault, one would provide one's own pole, but I believe that in throwing events, the object to be thrown is provided by the organization.
Also I don't know how American 10-pin bowling is made, but for the 9-pin bowling of German origin I used to play here in Brazil, balls would always be self-provided.
As for chess, it is true that in high level events all materials (even pens) would be organization provided, and that may remain true for most European tournaments, but it probably isn't true for most North American Open tournaments and certainly not true for most South American Open tournaments.
 
Back
Top