Understanding the 3x3

You're getting a GuHong when you're averaging 1:20? :fp You won't really get the full benefits of a DIY until you're at least sub -40....

DIY's get more necessary the faster you get but they benefit anyone who is using finger tricks and such. Anyway why does it matter. A guhong bought now is a guhong not bought later

EDIT: you have ordered a guhong and you are barely sub40, thats kinda hypocritical since you did say atleast sub 40
lolno. Because I AM sub -40? It doesn't matter if you're barely sub -40 or not. :p

Yet you had a DIY before that...

I did, but that's why I'm speaking from experience, the DIY didn't make much difference :o I was just trying to warn someone whom's place I was in before :)
 
I was just trying to warn someone whom's place I was in before :)

Warn him about what exactly? And why did he deserve a facepalm?

Get a good cube right when you start. More fun that way. Plus the investment (both money and effort) can motivate to continue more seriously. I have no idea why people would advise *against* getting a good cube right at the start, except for being jealous because they themselves weren't smart enough to do it.
 
Last edited:
I found it!!!! I found it!!!!!!! I'm editing the first post too.
3.1 Order
The question is, how do you discover these macros that do very small, specific things and
leave most of the cube unaltered? It turns out (and we shall see why later) that if you have a
macro with a certain order and you apply it for half or a third of that number of steps, the result
is often a usable (although usually very long) macro.
As an example, consider the FFRR macro that we experimented with before. We found (in
three different ways, hopefully) that the order of this macro is 6. The “large” divisors of 6 are
2 and 3, so you may find interesting macros by repeating the FFRR combination twice or three
times.
To do this, reset the cube and type FFRR into the “CurrentMacro” window. If you press the
Apply Macro button twice there’s a sort of a nice pattern, but it moves far too many facelets to
be useful for solving the cube. Press it a third time, however, and you’ll see that the net result is
that two pairs of edge cubies are exchanged and everything else remains exactly as it was before.
Thus FFRRFFRRFFRR might be useful to you as you’re solving a cube.
It’s easy to look for such macros. Simply type in various (usually short) sets of moves and
find the order of that operation. If that order is divisible by a small number like 2 or 3 or perhaps
5, try dividing the order by that number and applying the macro that number of times. There
is a shortcut for doing this. Suppose you find a pattern that repeats every 90 moves (the macro
FFLLBR, for example, has order 90). If you want to see what this does to the cube after 45
moves (for a total of 45×6 = 270 moves, which would be fairly painful to use), you can simply
type the following into the “Current Macro” window: “45(FFLLBR)”. A number in front of a
group of moves in parentheses tells Rubik to repeat the stuff inside that many times. These
groupings can be nested, but this will not be too useful for finding cube-solving macros.​
Obtained @ http://www.geometer.org/rubik/group.pdf :tu:tu
 
I can only repeat what has already been suggested: if you don't want to feel like a robot who's only applying the right algorithms for the cases that you get, you could learn the Petrus method. I learned it for the exact same reason; repeating algorithms and repeating even more algorithms gets dull after quite some time. With Petrus, you look for the pieces you need to build the blocks, and then join those pieces in a way that you think is the best. Seeing as every scramble puts your cube into a different state, chances you'll be doing the same over and over again are 0. :p
 
I can only repeat what has already been suggested: if you don't want to feel like a robot who's only applying the right algorithms for the cases that you get, you could learn the Petrus method. I learned it for the exact same reason; repeating algorithms and repeating even more algorithms gets dull after quite some time. With Petrus, you look for the pieces you need to build the blocks, and then join those pieces in a way that you think is the best. Seeing as every scramble puts your cube into a different state, chances you'll be doing the same over and over again are 0. :p

Well then i'd rather use roux, because it has 1 more intuitive step than petrus. The only difference between petrus and fridrich is F2L. Also i didn't say i wanted another method, i said i just need to understand the algorthims, learn to make different versions of them so i don't feel someone gave me instructions to do the cube but i did it myself (i would have played with the cube before learning how to solve it if i knew i'd feel this way).
 
Will lubing my store cube make it fast enough for finger tricks? My biggest problem is having to orient the sides perfectly to move others, the sides don't stretch.
 
Will lubing my store cube make it fast enough for finger tricks? My biggest problem is having to orient the sides perfectly to move others, the sides don't stretch.

wow.

question: yes. CRC, Jigaloo, shock oil, or any silicone based lubricants without petroleum distillates.

the sides dont stretch. i really lol'd at this. buy a DIY? storebought cubes need a lot of love, modifications, etc. to become speedcube worthy. compared to the DIY they have now a day, storebought is just too slow. its not a bad cube to learn on.

also, please post in correct threads, or create new threads (not preferred), one question answer thread, or use the search function
 
Back
Top