I was more questioning the fact that undesputed proof actually leads to everyone worshiping God not trying to give you proof.
I purposefully never actually said that undisputed proof exists for us today. There is proof, certainly, but its nothing like writing in the sky.
There is the classic answer of then trusting God wouldn't be by faith.
God could also be more glorified in us following Him even though we haven't seen Him. It shows that we don't need physical proof and don't need a rock falling from the sky telling us how to what to do, we have other spiritual connections with God that we follow and lead us to believe in Him.
But that doesn't contradict what I was saying about trying to prove things. Sorry that I don't have a really good answer for you.
@lofty. I was hoping that someone else would respond to what you asked me earlier because I don't want to get into an argument with someone I respect as a person, but I'll just try to keep this as brief as possible.
"Crap" was not an appropriate word for this discussion, and I'll admit to that, but I would like to clarify that I was not calling the religion crap. I was saying that things like the Earth being 6,000 years old, the Sun revolving around the earth, and the idea that someone could fit two of every species that exists on Earth right now onto one ship, and people living to 900 years old or whatever it is are "crap." I mean, I know that there are people who take things like that metaphorically, and I'm fine with drawing lessons out of stories that you don't think actually happened, but I just can't understand how people can believe things like that are actually true.
Don't worry about it, haven't you seen enough of this thread to know that I'm not going to get offended and argue but have a valid discussion with you.
Well like I said earlier, I haven't studied Genesis's primordial history. There are people who try to interpret the evidence different ways to get a young earth but I've never really heard any valid arguments that convinced me. Mostly bogus stuff that was debunked a long time ago.
Most people who (ministers, etc) who I have talked to have held to the Apparent Age Theory. Personally I think its a little bit of a cop out. But it goes something like God made Adam as an adult and He put Adam in a full grown garden, so He made a universe that was "full-grown" too.
I won't pretend to have an answer or an opinion on this one. But once you have a belief in God established and you allow for divine intervention anything can happen. I don't like to use that too much because I don't like all the implications of God giving us misleading evidence.
Personally I wouldn't have much of a problem as taking the primordial history as an allegory. But due to other religious convictions I have a hard time doing that. I really want to learn more about this stuff and I promise I'll be more knowledgeable in the future.