[Member Intro] 'sup, peeps

Lewis

Regular
Joined
Jul 27, 2008
Messages
84
Location
Newcastle-upon-tyne, UK
WCA ID
2018PATT01
Hi,

Guess I'm not technically a new member because I made this account way back in '07 or so, made a bunch of obnoxious teenage posts then disappeared and promptly forgot about it - hope this doesn't count as a 'late welcome' or whatever.
I started cubing way back in high school (this must've been about 2006 or so) and got down to an average of 35 or so seconds on 3x3x3. I could solve a bunch of other puzzles too (2x2 through 5x5, megaminx, skewb and a few others), again with times that weren't really much to write home about. After that little year-or-so long burst of enthusiasm I stopped cubing as much. Yeah, I'd still occasionally solve but not enough so that my times improved or anything.

Jump forward to the end of last year when I rediscovered cubing again, this time with transport and disposable income so that I could take it a bit more seriously. I bought a batch of brand spanking new cubes, to phase out the Eastsheen 4x4 and tiled chinaminx that had suffered pushing nine years of solving on and off in my clumsy hands. I also decided to maybe attend some competitions too if there's one near enough. I mean, I'm still abysmally slow by a lot of people's standards but having my arse kicked at a competition is still preferable to sitting at home solving on my own.

2x2x2: I average about 7.5 seconds I think, using Ortega with a few tweaks (i.e. I forgot some of the algs)
3x3x3: Averaging low 30's with what's essentially the beginners method I started off with, just with a few nifty tricks and time-saving algs I worked out along the way. One-look PLL is still a daunting prospect... No idea what my personal best time is, probably some flukey 3-move cross with a PLL skip way back whenever.

4x4x4: Averaging about 2 minutes exactly, I used to suck at bigger cubes but I think that's because I was part of what must be a tiny minority - people who were still using Eastsheen cubes as their main well into 2015. 5x5 and up, I'm not sure on my average times, all I know is it's slow. Especially 7x7x7, I'm talking 'timer batteries running out before I finish solving' slow here.

I can solve a bunch of others too, I've amassed a collection of about 75 or so more unusual and not-competition puzzles (for a while I was more into collecting than solving, I used to lurk the twistypuzzles forum wishing I had enough money for all these bizarre shape mods and such like). There's still a bunch I have no idea how to solve - I've been meaning to learn Square-1 for the longest time but there's just so many algorithms and I've got a memory like a ... err... what's one of those things called again?

Outside of cubing my hobbies include playing guitar, bass, keyboards/synths as well as the occasional tortured rendition of the tetris theme on the accordion. I write/compose a whole bunch of music too, but no-one apart from me seems to like it. I also read a fair bit (mainly non-fiction, boring-looking recreational maths books, or whatever pop-science stuff WH Smiths has in the reduced section) and waste a good chunk of paper in the name of modular origami (I must just be drawn to hobbies involving brightly-coloured polyhedron-shaped things...)

Anyway, I'm joining here again, a) as a desperate bid to try and make me more sociable, and b) in the hope that talking with a bunch of cubers who know what they're doing will encourage me to improve my own solve times a little bit. I mean, I'm not expecting to be sub-10 any time soon (unless we're talking pyraminx or something) but I've definitely got room for improvement!
 
Welcome back :D
Thanks!

where are u from? So far I am the only one form Rhode Island...
I'm from Newcastle, in the north-east of England, just slightly too far away from most competitions unless I decide to get a train to Manchester or Edinburgh or wherever and make a little weekend trip of it.
I get the feeling there aren't many other cubers in my neck of the woods either...
 
It always bothers me that beginners method users get so fast, and then have to learn CFOP and basically start over. I hope it's not too difficult for you. Either way, welcome back to the forums :)
 
It always bothers me that beginners method users get so fast, and then have to learn CFOP and basically start over. I hope it's not too difficult for you. Either way, welcome back to the forums :)
I just had a look through the wiki, seems like what I was referring to as a 'beginner method' isn't so far off CFOP - for F2L I use something similar to the 'Keyhole F2L' method except I'll often pair up a first-layer corner piece and a middle layer edge and insert together if it saves time. Then for the last layer I do 2-look OLL and usually 2-look PLL (I know some of the cases but nowhere hear the full 21, maybe about 15 of them). I guess I should stop putting off learning those last few PLLs next.

How do most people do F2L? Is it usually done by inserting each corner+edge as a pair, and just a matter of learning an alg for each case unless it's really intuitive?
 
I just had a look through the wiki, seems like what I was referring to as a 'beginner method' isn't so far off CFOP - for F2L I use something similar to the 'Keyhole F2L' method except I'll often pair up a first-layer corner piece and a middle layer edge and insert together if it saves time. Then for the last layer I do 2-look OLL and usually 2-look PLL (I know some of the cases but nowhere hear the full 21, maybe about 15 of them). I guess I should stop putting off learning those last few PLLs next.

How do most people do F2L? Is it usually done by inserting each corner+edge as a pair, and just a matter of learning an alg for each case unless it's really intuitive?

Sorta. You pair up a corner and edge pair and then insert it, but I'd recommend against learning algs for a while yet. Algs for f2l are only really useful for a few cases, and you don't need to worry about them yet. Learn it intuitively, and just do a lot of it. The other thing you can do is look at example solves on youtube. Feliks and Collin have some really good example solves that you can learn a lot from (but it might be over your head for a little bit until you really start understanding how to do f2l)
 
Back
Top