Straight-forward square-1 method

Joined
May 9, 2010
Messages
382
Location
Michigan
I've looked at the Thrawst and emilescube square-1 tutorials, and I'm not very satisfied with either of them. The former has more algs, but is too algorithmic with getting the cube shape (plus the alg sheet is confusing). And the latter has a good cube shape intuitiveness, but too few algs in orientation and permutation.

The main point is that I mess up algs too often and I need better algs to begin with. Any input would be appreciated as to where I could get better algs or maybe a website with clear, step-by-step instructions.
 
SCREW

http://www.speedsolving.com/forum/showthread.php?p=242234#post242234

L block - intuitive

R block - intuitive

CP - J and N perm

02:39:25 <+DanCohen> J = / (3,-3) / (3,0) / (-3,0) / (0,3) / (-3,0) /

02:39:31 <+DavidWoner> Nperm = [/(-3 -3)/(3,0)]x3

L/R edges - M2 and U perm

<+DanCohen> /3,0/1,0/0,-3/-1,0/-3,0/1,0/0,3/

Mslice - Intuition and /(3,0)/(0,3)/(1,0)/(0,-1)/(0,1)/(-1,-3)/(-3,0)/



Parity; /(-3,-3)/(3,0)/(-3,-3)/(2,0)/( -4,2)/(4,-2)/(1,0)/(-3,-3)/



1,0/-3,0/5,0/3,3/1,0/-2,0/2,0/0,-2/2,0/-4,0/3,-4/-3,-3/



03:59:32 <+DavidWoner> 1 0 / 6 -1 / 6 1 /

03:59:34 <+DavidWoner> is optimal
 
Never heard of Roux/screw square-1 method....... checking it out.....

I am really liking the video!

I just did like one solve with this method and my time was at least a minute less than I normally average.
 
Last edited:
Screw looks interesting, but I'm too in love with the cubezone method :P
 
I'm getting better at placing the blocks in the bottom layer, usually in under 30 seconds. The permutations are hard because I always think I know what to do but then I mess it up. That's where the loads and loads of algorithms help.
 
Back
Top