Standings of Members

Status
Not open for further replies.
Why don't you make an 8-9 second category? Are you trying to discriminate against really really fast people?

Anyway, er, it'd be nice to have a compilation of people's times, but why do it in the forum, where topics get old, people argue, and so on? Why not just use the wiki? Then people could add any PB avg12s they know, and create/remove categories whenever necessary.
I made a demo of something like this with a table a long time ago: Forum Best Times. The idea is that anyone can enter in their best averages for any event(s) they want, and then you can sort on any event to see who's the best. You could even do separate columns for best Fridrich/Petrus/ZZ/Roux/etc avg to see who's the best at what.
 
Why don't you make an 8-9 second category? Are you trying to discriminate against really really fast people?

Anyway, er, it'd be nice to have a compilation of people's times, but why do it in the forum, where topics get old, people argue, and so on? Why not just use the wiki? Then people could add any PB avg12s they know, and create/remove categories whenever necessary.
I made a demo of something like this with a table a long time ago: Forum Best Times. The idea is that anyone can enter in their best averages for any event(s) they want, and then you can sort on any event to see who's the best. You could even do separate columns for best Fridrich/Petrus/ZZ/Roux/etc avg to see who's the best at what.

im hungry
 
12: 00:14.67 x
11: 00:16.18 x
10: 00:32.73 x
9: 00:17.61 x
8: 00:19.21 x
7: 00:15.89 x
6: 00:15.51 x
5: 00:18.60 x
4: 00:18.00 x
3: 00:17.01 x
2: 00:15.34 x
1: 00:20.23 x

avg: 17.36

17-18
 
Silly thread is silly. Discussions over whether super-20 people matter aside, as qqwref pointed out, there are much better ways to keep track of this. The weekly forum competition, sites like Cubemania, or the wiki, just to name a few.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top