square 1 method

[DevenNadudvari]

What is the fastest square 1 method and where can i learn it?

 

[byu]

vandenbergh method, cubezone.be

 

[DevenNadudvari]

do i have to learn all the algs?

 

[James Kobel]

http://jmbaum.110mb.com/square1.htm *Cough cough*

 

[DevenNadudvari]

james could you do some example sloves?

 

[byu]

for vandenbergh, you don't need all the algs. but you asked for the "fastest" method, and fastest is vandenbergh with all the algs (in my opinion)

 

[James Kobel]

http://www.speedsolving.com/forum/showthread.php?t=9709
This old thread, the angle isn't the best, I have a few others that you might be able to see better, but they're slow(how embarrising).

 

[masterofthebass]

Jason's method is not the best... period. Tim Sun has a better LBL method if you are into that kind of thing, but Vandenbergh has proven to be the fastest so far. You don't need to learn anything close to all the algs. I average under 22 and only know about 25 algs in total.

 

[Swordsman Kirby]

Jason's method is not the best... period. Tim Sun has a better LBL method if you are into that kind of thing, but Vandenbergh has proven to be the fastest so far. You don't need to learn anything close to all the algs. I average under 22 and only know about 25 algs in total.

Well, parity algs are no fun anyway.

 

[blade740]

Jason's method is not the best... period. Tim Sun has a better LBL method if you are into that kind of thing, but Vandenbergh has proven to be the fastest so far. You don't need to learn anything close to all the algs. I average under 22 and only know about 25 algs in total.

Well, parity algs are no fun anyway.

Parity algs can be fun.

 

[rckclmb124]

Jason's method is not the best... period. Tim Sun has a better LBL method if you are into that kind of thing, but Vandenbergh has proven to be the fastest so far. You don't need to learn anything close to all the algs. I average under 22 and only know about 25 algs in total.

Well, parity algs are no fun anyway.

Parity algs can be fun.

I dont thinks so, it they take me like 10 seconds. If yours are like sub 5 or sub 4 they could be fun.

 

[fanwuq]

Jason's method is not the best... period. Tim Sun has a better LBL method if you are into that kind of thing, but Vandenbergh has proven to be the fastest so far. You don't need to learn anything close to all the algs. I average under 22 and only know about 25 algs in total.

And what is Tim's method? So far, I learned Jason's method simply because I only need 3 algs to solve it. (U, J, and parity.) What is the fastest method that requires less than 8 algs?

 

[blade740]

I was sub30 with simplified v'bergh with only 7 algs. I think dan got even faster than that (I ended up learning more algs >_>)

 

[fanwuq]

I was sub30 with simplified v'bergh with only 7 algs. I think dan got even faster than that (I ended up learning more algs >_>)

Which algs would they be? Is there a guide?

 

[DevenNadudvari]

for vandebrugh what permutaiton algs do i need to learn?

 

[blade740]

For Edge permutation, the important ones are adjacent/adjacent, opposite/opposite, and parity. For corners, learn N/J, J/J, and J alone.

It's not too difficult to learn all the CP algs, I'd suggest learning all of them. Work your way up to the algs on Dan's page. (danrcohen.com)