Square-1 Face Parity?

[Imperatrix]

Okay, I got 2 opposite ends solved yet whenever I try to solve the whole top face, I get 2 opposite ends unsolved. If I sound a bit unclear, I apologize but here are pictures of it:

 

[masterofthebass]

/(6,6)/

 

[Imperatrix]

Didn't work @@;

 

[masterofthebass]

well then you did it wrong, because that's what you do.

 

[Stefan]

Call it "edges" instead of "ends" and you'll be understood.

 

[Hyprul 9-ty2]

Do you mean edges? Its parity, you have to do a parity alg to fix it.

 

[Imperatrix]

I meant edges, I wrote ends instead by mistake. I apologize for that.
Anyway, I tried the parity algorithm and that backfired as well. Bah, I'll figure it out myself, but thanks for everyone's help!

 

[Weston]

No, you do the alg that Dan gave you. Basically what it's doing is it is swapping the U layer with the D layer and vice versa. Make sure youre doing both of the /s in the alg. A lot of people make the mistake of ignoring the first one.

 

[Dene]

Try (0,-1) / (1,1) / (5,-1) / (1,1) /

 

[Stefan]

Call it "edges" instead of "ends" and you'll be understood.

I meant edges

No, you do the alg that Dan gave you.

I hate being wrong.

 

[Dene]

Call it "edges" instead of "ends" and you'll be understood.

I meant edges

No, you do the alg that Dan gave you.

I hate being wrong.

I don't think you were wrong. It looks to me like the original poster wants to do an opposite edges swap on top, which the alg I gave does (it also swaps on the bottom layer, but he doesn't appear to want to solve that one yet). I don't know why Dan suggested a layer swap.


EDIT: ugh nevermind Mr. Pochmann, I misunderstood the point of your post. But I'll leave mine as it is . (How did I completely overlook the bold?)

 

[Stefan]

Well yeah, I was right in the sense that *someone* (you) understood. I was just baffled by Weston and wanted to express that.

And... "he"? Have you seen those finger nails?

 

[Dene]

To be perfectly honest, when someone says "look at my sq1" I tend to look at the square-1 . I had a similar situation last night; interesting. We'll go with "she" then, and hope this isn't another gender crisis >.<