Speed-age factor

15.20 / 23 = 0.66

In 7 days it will be
15.20 / 24 = 0.63

I don't like this ranking system. I forget his name, but the very young Japanese cuber at Worlds who's sub 20 would have something like
19.xx / 7 or 2.75 ish. Say someone is 35 and averages 1:35 this person would also have a 2.75ish in this ranking system. Forgive me if I have the young Japanese cuber's age or fastest average incorrect, I am just going by what I remember. He was absolutely amazing to watch by the way.

This ranking varies directly as time and inversely as age, so very young cubers will have a very large number in this ranking no matter what their solving time.

In short I don't like this ranking, and I don't see a clear way to interpret it at all, but I'll participate anyway :-D

Chris

Yoshiki Yumoto is 7 years old, and got a 18.58 avg

so that's 18.58/7 = 2.65 :)
 
15.27 / 30.87 = 0.49

Lucas, you might get closer to 1 if you don't round your age.

And this is a "ratio", not a "factor" !
 
Last edited:
I think he was taking his best avg ever. And I don't think it's his fault if he was smoking too much pot, because he's a college student in the Netherlands... I think that's the most stereotypical smoker.
 
Shouldnt it be age/avg? the current way older people have an advantage, i would have thought younger people should?
How does age/avg give younger people an advantage? Better think things through.

age/avg:

40/40 = 1
20/40 = 0.5
the person of 20 years old would have an advantage instead of

40/40 = 1
40/20 = 2
Where the older person would have an advantage

anyway...
avg/age = 50/15 = 3.3
age/avg = 15/50 = 0.3
 
Shouldnt it be age/avg? the current way older people have an advantage, i would have thought younger people should?
How does age/avg give younger people an advantage? Better think things through.

age/avg:

40/40 = 1
20/40 = 0.5
the person of 20 years old would have an advantage instead of

40/40 = 1
40/20 = 2
Where the older person would have an advantage

anyway...
avg/age = 50/15 = 3.3
age/avg = 15/50 = 0.3

Yes, a younger person would have a lower number, but in this case a higher value should be better, because a faster average will lead to a higher number
 
Back
Top