Solve Splits Feedback Tool for 2x2!

[Cuber987]

So, I have been using Feliks' solve splits tool for CFOP recently: https://www.cubeskills.com/blog/cfop-solve-splits-tool

I decided I wanted something similar for ortega 2x2. I can change the code on the google sheet to fit, and I already made a prototype. I now just need the data for normal splits. Please fill out the google form to help me with this, thanks!

P.S. I'll post the tool here when I'm done with it

Ortega Solve Splits

Thanks for helping!

forms.gle

 

[Cuber987]

Guys, I need more data. Only one response so far.

 

[Cuber987]

If you have already replied to the form before the "speedsolving username" was added to it, please reply and tell me so I can add you to a DM thread with early access! (for confirmation that it's you please tell me your overall mean for your solves that you did for the form)

Sneak peek into the tool with my times entered in:

 

[NmeCuber]

Umm, I did it and my avg was 4.5

 

[OldSwiss]

The Problem is that in normal solves you usually don't know the split times.

In 3x3 I could give you a lot of data from my smart cubes, but in 2x2 there are not many smart cubes,
So the only chance to know the splits is to analyze some movies in slow motion.

I don't do that and I think most of the others do that neither.

 

[Deleted member 36445]

So the only chance to know the splits is to analyze some movies in slow motion.

what kinds of movies?

 

[Cuber987]

The Problem is that in normal solves you usually don't know the split times.

In 3x3 I could give you a lot of data from my smart cubes, but in 2x2 there are not many smart cubes,
So the only chance to know the splits is to analyze some movies in slow motion.

I don't do that and I think most of the others do that neither.

Cstimer has a feature called multi-phase where you can press every time you finish a certain split. You can get all your information from there

Settings --> timer --> multi-phase

 

[Deleted member 36445]

Cstimer has a feature called multi-phase where you can press every time you finish a certain split. You can get all your information from there

Settings --> timer --> multi-phase

imagine if you average 1.01 and hitting space bar like crazy

 

[sDLfj]

If you have already replied to the form before the "speedsolving username" was added to it, please reply and tell me

Okay, I submitted splits, but I deleted the cstimer session, and I don't remember the average. I know the mean would be somewhere in between 7.5 and 8.5 seconds (I think mid to low 8s) and I submitted the form on January 30th a few seconds before 9:00 pm Eastern Standard Time (GMT -0500).

 

[CatSharked]

(for confirmation that it's you please tell me your overall mean for your solves that you did for the form)

My mean was 6.80

 

[lucazdoescubingstuff]

my mean was 7.17 (only 5 solves), gj @CatSharked

 

[ProStar]

I feel like splitting for 2x2 would be quite hard for anyone decently fast (even my ~4.2 average, which is far from being actually fast); the pauses between each step and distraction would probably significantly impact my time (maybe end up averaging like 5)

 

[Deleted member 36445]

I feel like splitting for 2x2 would be quite hard for anyone decently fast (even my ~4.2 average, which is far from being actually fast); the pauses between each step and distraction would probably significantly impact my time (maybe end up averaging like 5)

yeah is not practicall at all. maybe it's better using a smart cube or filming it and manually extracting the data

 

[ProStar]

yeah is not practicall at all. maybe it's better using a smart cube or filming it and manually extracting the data

I haven't tried the Giiker 2x2, but I imagine based on the limited (and rather poor for speed solving) options for smart 2x2s that filming would be the best option

 

[NmeCuber]

Can I refill out the form, I realized a more accurate response would have been 4.3=0.9(face)+1.6(oll)+1.8(pbl)

 

[Cuber987]

Can I refill out the form, I realized a more accurate response would have been 4.3=0.9(face)+1.6(oll)+1.8(pbl)

Sure