@kubesolver
If you can could you please put a WV basic F2L case in the readme I can't quite figure it out
If you can could you please put a WV basic F2L case in the readme I can't quite figure it out
Thanks for trying out my solver. I'm glad it works for you and please let me know if you think it misses some essential functionality.This solver has worked for me very well. I use it to generate 5style algorithms for UF buffer, to improve the 3BLD algs.
I think that if you ignore edges and centers then yesIs there a way to simulate 2x2 algorithims?
@ProStar now you have no excuse not to gen HKPLLOk. I have updated website kklzhost.com/kubesolver/ with some mac instructions.
@ProStar now you have no excuse not to gen HKPLL
In my opinion my kubesolver is better for alg generation. It's also very easy to integrate kubesolver with alg explorer so that you immediately get filtering of good candidates. You can use output from my program directly as input to the alg explorer. @PapaSmurf managed to combine it into one tool.Should I get this or cube explorer? What are the advantages and disadvantages of both?
The binaries on my webpage are for windows and mac, but the source code is pure ansi C so it should compile on any platform that has gcc.Can it work with a Chromebook?
I share a computer with my family, and would only be allowed one software. How long would it take to generate an alg with kubesolver as compared to CubeExplorer? If CubeExplorer makes more optimal solutions, and is easier to use, then why should I get kubesolver?The advantages of Cube Explorer over kubesolver that I am aware of are:
- CubeExplorer is better in optimal solving e.g. for the scramble generation purpose.
- CubeExplorer has a gui so if you're affraid of command line tools and text inputs then kubesolver is not for you
that's a really weird policy. What is the rationale behind it?I share a computer with my family, and would only be allowed one software.
I don't know. I don't know but in both programs the time spent to setup the input data will be much longer than the actual program execution so the speed doesn't really matter in my opinion. Also the program won't generate an alg, but tens, hundreds or thousands of all possible algorithms.How long would it take to generate an alg with kubesolver as compared to CubeExplorer?
if you care about optimal solution for a scramble then use Cube Explorer.if CubeExplorer makes more optimal solutions, and is easier to use, then why should I get kubesolver?
I don't think CubeExplorer is easy to use. I believe my program beats it in usability for the purpose of alg generation by a magnitude.if CubeExplorer (...) is easier to use
I honestly don't know.that's a really weird policy. What is the rationale behind it?
Ok, thanks, but how long would it take to setup the input data on each solver?I don't know. I don't know but in both programs the time spent to setup the input data will be much longer than the actual program execution so the speed doesn't really matter in my opinion. Also the program won't generate an alg, but tens, hundreds or thousands of all possible algorithms.
that's a really weird policy. What is the rationale behind it?