So there's this kid on youtube...

[Stefan]

Is this the "correct" solution?

I confirm until PLL (I went forwards and didn't check the PLL precisely, but it did look like a standard A perm).

I meant that it originates from very well known popups/ads, but it is not used in this way before.

If that's true, then I guess Google doesn't index those popups, because it literally gives 1 result. And I truly don't remember having seen it before, either.

 

[Stefan]

all the scrambles that people gave for the 9.90 solve video are all completely wrong.

Probably not the same scramble algorithm, but Erik's was a correct scramble (we say "scramble" both for the scramble algorithm and for the resulting cube, ought to be clear from context what exactly is meant if it matters).

 

[Logan]

...So are we going through with the plan (in ~15 minutes) or not?

 

[endless_akatsuki]

...So are we going through with the plan (in ~15 minutes) or not?

lol, you can. I don't know if, now, anybody will follow your example.

 

[StachuK1992]

I'm not going to, but I'd like some answers from him concerning his other "cheats."

 

[mcciff2112]

I just read through this entire thread. Everyone... all the scrambles that people gave for the 9.90 solve video are all completely wrong. It was NOT a WCA scramble, I had someone else scramble it RANDOMLY for me.

You can find a scramble for position on the cube. It doesn't matter whether it was hand scrambled or not, it's still possible to generate a scramble that will give you the exact same result.

 

[Stefan]

I'm not going to, but I'd like some answers from him concerning his other "cheats."

You might wanna name them so he knows what you're talking about.

 

[StachuK1992]

I'm not going to, but I'd like some answers from him concerning his other "cheats."

You might wanna name them so he knows what you're talking about.

I understand. Thanks for not hating me after my childish actions.

 

[puzzlemaster]

I'm not going to, but I'd like some answers from him concerning his other "cheats."

You might wanna name them so he knows what you're talking about.

I understand. Thanks for not hating me after my childish actions.

Stefan doesn't hate you. Stefan makes you hate yourself. Haha i'm just kidding.

 

[EmersonHerrmann]

Hey wait....isn't this the kid who holds the whip-it UWR?????

 

[puzzlemaster]

Hey wait....isn't this the kid who holds the whip-it UWR?????

yes. yes he is.

 

[Stefan]

Thanks for not hating me after my childish actions.

Oh well, I'd say it de-escalated early enough and I hope everything will end up fine now.

Stefan doesn't hate you. Stefan makes you hate yourself.

LOL. I do like that thought.

 

[Stefan]

Oh and a suggestion for Ben: Use computer-generated scrambles when possible, for example from www.cubetimer.com or other cube timers. Human scrambles are usually bad quality, especially if done by some non-cuber. I'd call a lucky solve of a proper computer-scramble more legitimate than a non-lucky solve of a human-scramble, and I think most here would agree (at least the smart ones, and if necessary I'll define smart as agreeing with me). Also, single times are almost meaningless, so I suggest you collect and post averages as well.

 

[puzzlemaster]

Stefan doesn't hate you. Stefan makes you hate yourself.

LOL. I do like that thought.

I was thinking about some smart comment to make. I thought of that and I thought it sounded pretty good haha.

 

[Stefan]

He's getting destroyed in the comments and he just won't give in or take the video down. It's really very sad.

Still think so?

i'm a "fake b*tch" apparently. so he says on my pyraminx video.

No, he said "fake b*tch hater", and way after this thread and the negative comments had started. Why did you omit what made it clear he was responding to haters, instead portraying him as an unwarranted hater himself?

(just entertaining myself by re-reading the early messages that I only skimmed at first (and now I'm done))

 

[ThePizzaGuy92]

O Gawd, Not dees kindz o kids agin!

 

[Dene]

Hah! There I am. How did I miss that? Oh well I no longer have an opinion on the person in question then.

So... you're done? You're not offended that *I haven't* subscribed to you? Do I mean nothing to you?

Ah well if you want to make this about yourself :rolleyes:

Actually, I had at some stage noticed that you haven't subscribed to me.
I don't actually care about having lots of subscribers, naturally. I'm not out to gain partnership or anything. People can subscribe to me if they like, it's up to them.
I just like to put up videos that show off my progress in my hobbies (pretty much only cubing, naturally) or else I try to make videos that contain original ideas that I have come up with (or at least that I hope are original).
(As a matter of fact, I have another idea that I plan on making a video for, but the idea is not developed enough yet [SUPA TEASA]).

Anyway, the point is that I wasn't actually offended (but you already know that ). I just felt like having some fun in this lolthread.

As for the fact that you haven't subscribed: I guess you have your reasons. I just figured it was because you greatly disliked, hated, or just had a general negative attitude towards me >.<

(I can hardly judge; I personally don't do the whole "subscribe" thing).

 

[Stefan]

I personally don't do the whole "subscribe" thing.

Yeah, I don't much, either. I'm subscribed to 9 channels and really only use the two comedy ones.

 

[Paul Wagner]

I sent him a message telling him how obvious his fakes were. And the obvious contradictions in his channel, and this is all he responded with.

Huh? I dont know what you are on about...

StachuK, Im in.

You really can't talk you had a blindsolve video that you took down, but nonetheless it was fake.