So there's this kid on youtube...

[Stefan]

using some computer magic I have made a scramble that matches his for the sub 10 3x3 video. Scramble with red on F and yellow U.

L' U2 R2 B2 L' D2 R B2 L' F2 L' D' L2 U' L2 F' U F'

I got a 6.20 on it lol.

The scramble for the 9.90 solve is: D B2 U B2 U' B2 U B2 U R2 U2 R D2 B' U2 B U L2 U L2 (20f)

If anyone wants it.

Edit: 9.93 on it ;D

I just didn't take the time to make it optimal .

Or to make it correct. I confirm Erik's scramble. Wow, several people even used Patrick's scramble but nobody bothered to check it. You guys might want to try again, the correct scramble actually does allow the 3 move double xcross that fazrul's mentioned.

 

[Logan]

There you go Stefan

Huh? I had already mentioned those comments. You need to show them to Stachu, not me. (Actually I don't think you need to show them to anyone)

I was going to show them to stachu, but then you posted. so I decided to back you up since I had already copied and edited the pictures.

 

[PatrickJameson]

Or to make it correct. I confirm Erik's scramble. Wow, several people even used Patrick's scramble but nobody bothered to check it.

Huh. I apologize for that. I had a few problems with the last two pieces and cube explorer's auto correct feature changed a few stickers. I must have mistakenly fixed them.

 

[Stefan]

The solve is about 33 moves.

Exactly 33, actually.

My personal WCA record is 9.56, I believe it was 31 moves.

 

[SkilfulPenguin]

Yeah, I was just going to mention, maybe he's finding easy scrambles and then putting it into cubexplorer and getting like a 10-20 move fix. And the scramble that you guys posted does give you like 3 edge pieces already placed for the cross, (2 moves to finish the cross to be exact)

 

[Stefan]

maybe he's finding easy scrambles and then putting it into cubexplorer and getting like a 10-20 move fix

Yes, that must be the reason why he started that 9.90 video with an already scrambled cube.

 

[Carrot]

I don't think he is faking, I just think he needs to think about the things 2-5 times before he is telling us that he is better than the rest xD

Did he do that? (Besides those two UWRs mentioned earlier)

Not really...

 

[(X)]

I just came across another reason why I like Ben. Check out how he asks for subscriptions (picture below).

First time I don't despise someone for asking for subscriptions. He made me laugh. A lot. I find it very smart and well-done. And according to google, that sentence doesn't appear anywhere on the web besides his channel, so I assume he came up with that himself.

I can't tell if you are sarcastic or not, it does appear other places on the internet, as I am sure you know. But I think it's funny and I have not seen this at youtube or similar at sites before. I like it, I am so close to clicking that button

 

[Stefan]

I can't tell if you are sarcastic or not

I'm not.

it does appear other places on the internet, as I am sure you know.

I don't. Please show me where. Like I said, Google only found it on his channel. And changing "orange" to "yellow" or "1" to "one" or "that" to "the" even resulted in zero results (those are what I'd consider the most likely originals if his were a modified copy).

 

[Dene]

Well I looked through his subscribers and couldn't see myself there, so I am deeply offended!

 

[Stefan]

Well I looked through his subscribers and couldn't see myself there, so I am deeply offended!

Um... you might want to check out his subscriptions instead.

 

[Dene]

Sorry that's what I meant ^_^

(Dene doesn't spend enough time on YouTube to care for the terminology).

 

[Stefan]

Well when did you look? A few minutes ago he was subscribed to you.

 

[Dene]

Eh what? You're saying I looked through almost 20 pages of users, and missed it? (btw I looked just before I posted).

 

[Stefan]

I think you were on page 17 or 18.

Alternatively, search for him in the list of your subscribers which is much shorter.

 

[Dene]

Hah! There I am. How did I miss that? Oh well I no longer have an opinion on the person in question then.

 

[ben1996123]

Ok ok ok ok ok!

I would just like to clear things up now.

I just read through this entire thread. Everyone... all the scrambles that people gave for the 9.90 solve video are all completely wrong. It was NOT a WCA scramble, I had someone else scramble it RANDOMLY for me.

Stefan Pochmann: Thanks

Everyone else, my videos are not fake. I record quite a lot of solves, and upload the really fast ones.

I just have 1 question... Who started all of this hate towards me?

 

[Stefan]

Hah! There I am. How did I miss that? Oh well I no longer have an opinion on the person in question then.

So... you're done? You're not offended that *I haven't* subscribed to you? Do I mean nothing to you?

 

[qqwref]

using some computer magic I have made a scramble that matches his for the sub 10 3x3 video. Scramble with red on F and yellow U.

L' U2 R2 B2 L' D2 R B2 L' F2 L' D' L2 U' L2 F' U F'

I got a 6.20 on it lol.

Is this the "correct" solution?
Double xcross: U D R'
Third pair: U' R' U R d R U R'
Fourth pair + OLLskip: y U2 R' U2 R U' R' U' R U' R' U R
PLL: U' x L' D L' U2 L D' L' U2 L2

 

[(X)]

I can't tell if you are sarcastic or not

I'm not.

it does appear other places on the internet, as I am sure you know.

I don't. Please show me where. Like I said, Google only found it on his channel. And changing "orange" to "yellow" or "1" to "one" or "that" to "the" even resulted in zero results (those are what I'd consider the most likely originals if his were a modified copy).

I meant that it originates from very well known popups/ads, but it is not used in this way before.