[Unofficial] Rubik's Mirror Blocks - 35.44

[watermelon]

Rubik's Mirror Blocks solved in 35.44.

 

[EmersonHerrmann]

Wow, nice solve! That cube seems to move nicely I like the sound of it, too.

 

[MistArts]

Haven't seen Mitchell here for a long time. Good to see you. Are you going to VA open?

 

[watermelon]

Thanks!

I usually check this forum a couple of times per day, though I don't post that often. anyway, I will be at the VA Open, and look forward to seeing everyone there.

 

[DAE_JA_VOO]

LOL!!! How the hell do you recognise OLLs and PLLs on that thing?

Looks awesome, i really want one.

 

[siva.shanmukh]

Where can we buy Rubik's mirror blocks from? Is it available on www.rubik's.com?

 

[ParityErrors]

Nice solve, I still need several minutes to solve it.



Q

 

[Ron]

Impressive solve.

 

[AvGalen]

solving mirror blocks is soooo easy

It is just like getting a square-1 back to square and then skipping everything else

But seriously, 35.44 seems almost impossible to me. Incredible solve

 

[rjohnson_8ball]

LOL!!! How the hell do you recognise OLLs and PLLs on that thing?

Looks awesome, i really want one.

Exactly what I say.

 

[fcwy1]

LOL!!! How the hell do you recognise OLLs and PLLs on that thing?

Looks awesome, i really want one.

Exactly what I say.

me too.

Just that
how do you even recognise cross, f2L, OLL and PLL?

 

[AvGalen]

OLL and PLL are easy to recognise.
Cross can be recognised during inspection
F2L is the hardest part

 

[qqwref]

I totally agree with the F2L being the hardest part. Over the Essen weekend I did a lot of solves on a cube Michal Halczuk had which just had a different blue symbol on each face. OLL and PLL were easy to recognize if you knew what symbol was on U and what was across from what, but F2L was much much harder because you had to actually find the pieces instead of just seeing them there. Incidentally I got down to about 26 seconds single on that, so maybe if I had a good Mirror Blocks... :rolleyes:

 

[watermelon]

Thanks for your kind comments everyone. At the moment, I find F2L to be generally more difficult to recognize than OLL/PLL, though there are some tricky LL cases that are also somewhat difficult to recognize (especially the PLLs with no blocks such as E, H, and Z). Also, higher turning speeds on this puzzle are harder to achieve simply because of the varying shapes and sizes you'll encounter while performing an algorithm, in contrast to the uniform cubies of a 3x3x3.

 

[riffz]

روبیک آینه ای با قیمتی مناسب
برای خرید و اطلاعات بیشتر در مورد انواع مکعب روبیک و بازیهای مختلف به سایت ایران پازل مراجعه فرمایید.

www.iranpuzzle.ir

:fp

I tried solving my friend's and I must say, it was harder than it looked. Well, not hard, but recognition took forever.