Stefan
Member
Why do you say it's not an exact number?
Pi is a number, not a representation of one.
And you probably wanted to say you remembered "the first five digits".
Pi is a number, not a representation of one.
And you probably wanted to say you remembered "the first five digits".
You mean: "the first five digits of the representation of pi"?
The oldest BLD solver in the world: Mats Bergsten has done 9,000!!! decimals of pi.
The oldest BLD solver in the world: Mats Bergsten has done 9,000!!! decimals of pi.
Of course, there is someone who is older than Mats who has had a successful BLD solve.
The oldest BLD solver in the world: Mats Bergsten has done 9,000!!! decimals of pi.
Of course, there is someone who is older than Mats who has had a successful BLD solve.
Yes, but not in a WCA competiton
The oldest BLD solver in the world: Mats Bergsten has done 9,000!!! decimals of pi.
Of course, there is someone who is older than Mats who has had a successful BLD solve.
Yes, but not in a WCA competiton
Wrong!
The oldest BLD solver in the world: Mats Bergsten has done 9,000!!! decimals of pi.
Of course, there is someone who is older than Mats who has had a successful BLD solve.
Yes, but not in a WCA competiton
Wrong!
I assume you mean Bill McGaugh? He got a solve a couple of years ago, when he was younger than Mats. But he's older than Mats now. So Mats is the person who was oldest while getting a successful solve in competition, and Bill is the oldest person who has had a successful BLD solve. So Bruce is right.
For Mats to ever beat Bill with Bruce's record, he will have to outlive Bill.
Particularly not a particular one, so what really annoyed me about Tox|k's message was that it suggested a base-10 representation as *the* way to write pi.
3.1415926535897