Personality Test

Daniel Wu

Premium Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2009
Messages
1,573
Location
Dallas, TX
WCA ID
2010WUDA01
I'm just curious as to what people would get on this test.

I ended up being ISTJ (introverted, sensing, thinking, judging) with a 100, 12, 100, 22 percent strength for those traits respectively. Post your results!
 
Your Type is
INTP
Introverted Intuitive Thinking Perceiving
Strength of the preferences %
22 38 38 56

Qualitative analysis of your type formula

You are:

* slightly expressed introvert
* moderately expressed intuitive personality
* moderately expressed thinking personality
* moderately expressed perceiving personality

Didn't feel as though the questions were specific enough, but those bullet points are pretty accurate.
 
Your Type is
INTJ
Introverted Intuitive Thinking Judging
Strength of the preferences %
44 75 50 22

You are:
moderately expressed introvert
distinctively expressed intuitive personality
moderately expressed thinking personality
slightly expressed judging personality
 
INTJ
89, 50, 12, 22

" You are:
  • very expressed introvert
  • moderately expressed intuitive personality
  • slightly expressed thinking personality
  • slightly expressed judging personality"
Edit:
"INTJs know what they know, and perhaps still more importantly, they know what they don't know."

~sigh~
Seems about right.

Well, the above is IRL.

Edit2:
"...are rare, comprising no more than, say, one percent of the population, and they are rarely encountered outside their office, factory, school, or laboratory."
I'm guessing at least a third of SS will fall under this category, yet this will still hold true.

Edit 3:
If this gets a good deal of posts, like I hope, I'd be interested into doing comparisons very much.
 
Last edited:
Extraverted
Intuitive
Thinking
Perceiving
however, it says ENTP, instead of EITP...


Only person with a E for the start..
 
78 38 100 33 INTJ
To outsiders, INTJs may appear to project an aura of "definiteness", of self-confidence. This self-confidence, sometimes mistaken for simple arrogance by the less decisive, is actually of a very specific rather than a general nature; its source lies in the specialized knowledge systems that most INTJs start building at an early age. When it comes to their own areas of expertise -- and INTJs can have several -- they will be able to tell you almost immediately whether or not they can help you, and if so, how. INTJs know what they know, and perhaps still more importantly, they know what they don't know.

INTJs are perfectionists, with a seemingly endless capacity for improving upon anything that takes their interest. What prevents them from becoming chronically bogged down in this pursuit of perfection is the pragmatism so characteristic of the type: INTJs apply (often ruthlessly) the criterion "Does it work?" to everything from their own research efforts to the prevailing social norms. This in turn produces an unusual independence of mind, freeing the INTJ from the constraints of authority, convention, or sentiment for its own sake.

INTJs are known as the "Systems Builders" of the types, perhaps in part because they possess the unusual trait combination of imagination and reliability. Whatever system an INTJ happens to be working on is for them the equivalent of a moral cause to an INFJ; both perfectionism and disregard for authority may come into play, as INTJs can be unsparing of both themselves and the others on the project. Anyone considered to be "slacking," including superiors, will lose their respect -- and will generally be made aware of this; INTJs have also been known to take it upon themselves to implement critical decisions without consulting their supervisors or co-workers. On the other hand, they do tend to be scrupulous and even-handed about recognizing the individual contributions that have gone into a project, and have a gift for seizing opportunities which others might not even notice.

In the broadest terms, what INTJs "do" tends to be what they "know". Typical INTJ career choices are in the sciences and engineering, but they can be found wherever a combination of intellect and incisiveness are required (e.g., law, some areas of academia). INTJs can rise to management positions when they are willing to invest time in marketing their abilities as well as enhancing them, and (whether for the sake of ambition or the desire for privacy) many also find it useful to learn to simulate some degree of surface conformism in order to mask their inherent unconventionality.

Personal relationships, particularly romantic ones, can be the INTJ's Achilles heel. While they are capable of caring deeply for others (usually a select few), and are willing to spend a great deal of time and effort on a relationship, the knowledge and self-confidence that make them so successful in other areas can suddenly abandon or mislead them in interpersonal situations.

This happens in part because many INTJs do not readily grasp the social rituals; for instance, they tend to have little patience and less understanding of such things as small talk and flirtation (which most types consider half the fun of a relationship). To complicate matters, INTJs are usually extremely private people, and can often be naturally impassive as well, which makes them easy to misread and misunderstand. Perhaps the most fundamental problem, however, is that INTJs really want people to make sense. :-) This sometimes results in a peculiar naivete', paralleling that of many Fs -- only instead of expecting inexhaustible affection and empathy from a romantic relationship, the INTJ will expect inexhaustible reasonability and directness.

Probably the strongest INTJ assets in the interpersonal area are their intuitive abilities and their willingness to "work at" a relationship. Although as Ts they do not always have the kind of natural empathy that many Fs do, the Intuitive function can often act as a good substitute by synthesizing the probable meanings behind such things as tone of voice, turn of phrase, and facial expression. This ability can then be honed and directed by consistent, repeated efforts to understand and support those they care about, and those relationships which ultimately do become established with an INTJ tend to be characterized by their robustness, stability, and good communications.

EDIT: if this gets enough replys, i'll make a pie chart of the percentages.
 
Last edited:
The problem with these things is I always feel and urge to put down contradictory answers on slightly related questions so mine will be pretty inaccurate...
 
ISFJ
Introverted- 78
Sensing- 12
Feeling- 56
Judging- 56

"You are:
  • very expressed introvert
  • slightly expressed sensing personality
  • moderately expressed feeling personality
  • moderately expressed judging personality"
 
Your Type is
ENTP
Extraverted Intuitive Thinking Perceiving
Strength of the preferences %
44 12 12 22

You are:
moderately expressed extravert

slightly expressed intuitive personality

slightly expressed thinking personality

slightly expressed perceiving personality
 
Your Type is
ISTP
Introverted Sensing Thinking Perceiving
Strength of the preferences %
22 62 50 11

You are:
slightly expressed introvert

distinctively expressed sensing personality

moderately expressed thinking personality

slightly expressed perceiving personality

Famous ISTP: Charles Bronson, Bruce Lee, Meg Ryan, Ronaldo
 
INTJ
Introverted Intuitive Thinking Judging
56 75 12 33

# moderately expressed introvert
# distinctively expressed intuitive personality
# slightly expressed thinking personality
# moderately expressed judging personality


http://keirsey.com/handler.aspx?s=keirsey&f=fourtemps&tab=5&c=mastermind



Don't do that test. It looks like a bit of a joke to me.

Actually most psychologists would use that test, it is a way they can tell one's personality. Jung was a very good and famous psychologist. But if you don't want to take it, that is, and always will be, your opinion and your decision.
 
Last edited:
Introverted; Intuitive; Thinking; Perceiving
100;50;62;11

You are:
very expressed introvert
moderately expressed intuitive personality
distinctively expressed thinking personality
slightly expressed perceiving personality
 
Back
Top