Non-LL Affecting Orientation Algs

But I don't understand all the {B? as BLB'-BL'B} "comments"
Neither did I (at first). But if you do BLB' BL'B, the 4 middle moves cancel out giving you B2. It should be more like B [L [B' B] L'] B. However, I'm guessing that site used an optimal solver to find its algs, so I don't know why there would be those huge cancellations...

Edit: The site says "This page is the presentation of a computer work that I did in summer 2000 and in the beginning of 2001." So why are there cancellations then?
 
Originally posted by watermelon@Apr 21 2007, 10:13 AM
But if you do BLB' BL'B, the 4 middle moves cancel out giving you B2. It should be more like B [L [B' B] L'] B. However, I'm guessing that site used an optimal solver to find its algs, so I don't know why there would be those huge cancellations...

Edit: The site says "This page is the presentation of a computer work that I did in summer 2000 and in the beginning of 2001." So why are there cancellations then?
Because it shows that those algs are actually combinations of 2 (or sometimes more) LL algs, and if you think about it this way learning is easier. If you check what the cancellations, they always solve F2L and then break it again.
 
Back
Top