xXzaKerXx
Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2009
- Messages
- 441
Maybe it's because of that spoiler in a spoiler in a spoiler in a spoiler thing. That can be annoying. But besides that, they really aren't that bad.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We implemented a 2 line signature rule a while ago because people would make signatures that were obnoxiously long, filled with every PB ever and a bunch of pictures. This took away from the actual content. Using spoilers in signatures is similar to this. It makes signatures larger and more noticeable and takes away from the actual content of the threads.
For the dictatorship thing: we run it like a dictatorship as opposed to a "have everyone vote on everything" kind of thing to, as well as other reasons, avoid ignorance. People often jump to conclusions without thinking about what they're actually deciding.
Also, the banning is probably a bit strict. I'll probably just change people's sigs after the 7 days if I see any. Dan should do the same.
I don't understand your reasoning behind making it 3 instead of 2. Probably a language issue going on here. Could you explain why you would like it to be 3 instead of 2? I don't see a real need to have one more line.
totally agreed.Is it not possible to make it so that spoiler tags just don't work in sigs?
Nooooooooooo xD
Of all the things to fix on this forum...
I just had to
![]()
This right here. As soon as I saw the OP, this is what I imagined went on.fazrulz said:
thats funny, because its exactly what happened! Now when you guys get to be administrators, then you can decide your own rules.
Agreed. And I know what my sig is going to be now, I'll change it later lol...If people don't want to read spoilers they don't have to click on it. How is this an issue?