New method?

[BatafCube]

Solve 2 opposit edges
Solve F2L (the M slice can help in this step)
OR you can solve 2 opposite 1x2x3 blocks (again the M slice can help in here)
Orient Remaining(spelling?) Edges using M and U moves (around 5 cases)
Solve the DB edge using M and U moves
Solve the DF Edge+Orienting Top Corners i think its possible using R U and S moves (i think its best if you hold the DF edge so its DR)
PLL-21 algs

The problem that I cant make algs for the DF edge+CO.If some1 wants to make the algs post them here.There are around 25 algs i think.

What do you think of the method?

 

[Davepencilguin]

Sounds like Roux, but with random steps switched around to make it a "new method."

 

[nlCuber22]

Solve 2 opposit edges
Solve F2L (the M slice can help in this step)
OR you can solve 2 opposite 1x2x3 blocks (again the M slice can help in here)
Orient Remaining(spelling?) Edges using M and U moves (around 5 cases)
Solve the DB edge using M and U moves
Solve the DF Edge+Orienting Top Corners i think its possible using R U and S moves (i think its best if you hold the DF edge so its DR)
PLL-21 algs

The problem that I cant make algs for the DF edge+CO.If some1 wants to make the algs post them here.There are around 25 algs i think.

What do you think of the method?

Ew.

 

[Athefre]

This is a common idea (both of them) people ask about often. It ends up being more moves than "Roux" and seems to be slower.

 

[lilkdub503]

Alright, this is what upsets people. If you are this new, or haven't thought about this for more than 25 minutes, don't post this. We here are always welcome to new ideas, but you have to have some sort of foundation, with algorithms and example solves.

 

[BatafCube]

So its not a new method.I wanted to ask if it is.....

 

[Edmund]

I thought I had a pretty good idea for a method awhile back (maybe a month) and it basically always forced an OLL skip after some vh/winter set-ups. But the vast number of algs brought it down. I'm not saying algs breaks down your method but it could be something else. Think about it for a few weeks, write solutions in comparisons to other methods, and do the solves. You can figure it out on your own.

 

[Lucas Garron]

Okay, this is getting ridiculous.
I don't want to stop people from posting their ideas, but you actually need to use your brain to come up with a "new method," even if it's "just for fun" or "just an idea."
And describing successive subgroups is not enough to specify a method, unless your first name is Morwen.

BatafCube:
Find some algs/make your description clearer, write down a few example solves, and PM me. I'll be happy to open up the thread then.

 

[brunson]

I just added this to the FAQ: http://www.speedsolving.com/wiki/index.php/FAQ#I_think_I_invented_a_new_method.2C_did_I.3F