solved
Member
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2011
- Messages
- 20
Clayy9
Page 69: What's the problem here?
Jaycee uses points on an invalid target, and you stop him. He then is annoyed (presumable) because he couldn't use his points anymore, which explains his next statement in that post
Page 70: Where did I stop HelpCube from using the remaining 6 points? It's not my fault HelpCube hasn't used any points to (-) someone during this game...
My argument is not that you activly prevented people from using points after they incorrectly targeted someone, but that the general interpretation (Which is relevant because the rule is not clearly defined) was that the player is unable to re-use mispent points. This is valid evidence, because the player never reposted to use the rest of his points, even though he had plenty of opertunity. (Also, on page 75 cube novice uses his points to (-) you, proving he doesn't have any problem with doing so.)
Page 74: I didn't stop them from using the points they couldn't use on Deluchie (who was at/near 75 points).
This is valid evidence, because the player never reposted to use the rest of his points, even though he had plenty of opertunity. This implies, given several sources, that people believe points cannot be used after miss-spent. In fact, I have posted incorrect usage of points early on in the game, and I believed that I couldn't re use them. I didnt submit this, because I doub you believe me.
Page 75: What do you mean? The first three positive points were recorded, and TiLiMayor didn't use the remaining 6 points.
See above
Jaycess
That is quite possible, although I think it may primarily a matter of personal judgement, considering some technicalities I used were "implied" and not actually spelled out at any point.Solved, though I want the elimination, I have to say you're wrong here.
I don't really no how to interpret this, except that you seem to be sure I am wrong without giving a reason. I guess I will take it that you mean I am wrong, but in a way that is complex and difficult to prove. If I have to be wrong, I guess this is the way I would to like it to be.I'm sure if others were actually reading this they would prove you wrong, but I'm too lazy.
Either way, what Clayy says goes.
I realize this, and my argument was more for personal pleasure then seriousness. After all, I was basically arguing your point.
(He hasn't changed any rules, either.)
Well, yes and no. He seems to have acted differently in his reply to noobcuber then he had previously, in a way that I suspect was deliberately to give the appearance that he had always held that stance, and thus nullify that point in my argument.
Last edited: