Member Elimination - Game 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Clayy9​

Page 69: What's the problem here?
Jaycee uses points on an invalid target, and you stop him. He then is annoyed (presumable) because he couldn't use his points anymore, which explains his next statement in that post

Page 70: Where did I stop HelpCube from using the remaining 6 points? It's not my fault HelpCube hasn't used any points to (-) someone during this game...
My argument is not that you activly prevented people from using points after they incorrectly targeted someone, but that the general interpretation (Which is relevant because the rule is not clearly defined) was that the player is unable to re-use mispent points. This is valid evidence, because the player never reposted to use the rest of his points, even though he had plenty of opertunity. (Also, on page 75 cube novice uses his points to (-) you, proving he doesn't have any problem with doing so.)

Page 74: I didn't stop them from using the points they couldn't use on Deluchie (who was at/near 75 points).
This is valid evidence, because the player never reposted to use the rest of his points, even though he had plenty of opertunity. This implies, given several sources, that people believe points cannot be used after miss-spent. In fact, I have posted incorrect usage of points early on in the game, and I believed that I couldn't re use them. I didnt submit this, because I doub you believe me.

Page 75: What do you mean? The first three positive points were recorded, and TiLiMayor didn't use the remaining 6 points.
See above


Jaycess​
Solved, though I want the elimination, I have to say you're wrong here.
That is quite possible, although I think it may primarily a matter of personal judgement, considering some technicalities I used were "implied" and not actually spelled out at any point.

I'm sure if others were actually reading this they would prove you wrong, but I'm too lazy.
I don't really no how to interpret this, except that you seem to be sure I am wrong without giving a reason. I guess I will take it that you mean I am wrong, but in a way that is complex and difficult to prove. If I have to be wrong, I guess this is the way I would to like it to be.

Either way, what Clayy says goes.

I realize this, and my argument was more for personal pleasure then seriousness. After all, I was basically arguing your point.

(He hasn't changed any rules, either.)

Well, yes and no. He seems to have acted differently in his reply to noobcuber then he had previously, in a way that I suspect was deliberately to give the appearance that he had always held that stance, and thus nullify that point in my argument.
 
Last edited:
My point is this: I have never stopped a person from using points when they followed the rules regarding using points. If someone used points illegally, then those points were considered not used and were able to be used again (regardless if they were). Is there anywhere this is not true?
 
]If someone used points illegally, then those points were considered not used and were able to be used again (regardless if they were). Is there anywhere this is not true?

Other then your most recent post about noobcub3r, which I am disregarding because It came after my initial argument, you never seem to clarify whether or not they still have those points. Because of this, popular opinion seems relivant, because it shows what impression you gave. To attempt to show popular opinion was in my favor, I noted the posts in my post #963, clarified in 967.


Honestly, you are both the opposition and the judge, so I guess my arguments don't really effect the outcome. Still, I'm having fun, and I'm guessing you are at least somewhat engaged, because otherwise you would stop posting.
 
If the only problem was that I didn't say that they still had those points, then I can understand your point. But, I still don't think you should blame me for what others assumed (even if they had a reason to assume so). Not to mention that on the OP, it shows how many points you have left to use, and if they were confused, they could have checked that.
 
Le-double post.

-5 n00bcuber.

This puts him at 19, the perfect number for him to be at from the perspective of someone who's eliminated. Clayy, I request that you don't use your remaining points on him. xD
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top