• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 35,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!

[WR] Maciej Czapiewski 0.49 2x2 single

Joined
Sep 28, 2008
Messages
464
Likes
23
Location
Germany
WCA
2008KARL02
YouTube
whauk
#48
This, I don't know why people are making a big deal out of the knowledge. If you can't see U'RUR' then you are probably not sub-10 anyway.
My official 2x2 avg is 3.xy and I once missed a pretty obvious 5-mover. Solution would have been U2 R' U' R and some AUF. I was always cofident, that I would recognize such easy solutions. However in the inspection time pressure plays a big role and we sometimes don't see the forest because of all the trees. (A nice little saying from Germany, that actually translates quite well.)
 
Joined
Nov 10, 2013
Messages
43
Likes
3
Location
New York. USA
WCA
2014GROV01
YouTube
SaranshGroverCubing
#49
My official 2x2 avg is 3.xy and I once missed a pretty obvious 5-mover. Solution would have been U2 R' U' R and some AUF. I was always cofident, that I would recognize such easy solutions. However in the inspection time pressure plays a big role and we sometimes don't see the forest because of all the trees. (A nice little saying from Germany, that actually translates quite well.)
Yeah , sometimes 6 options being there is not the best thing of all. If i see that is not U' R U R' rather a 6 mover right at the beginning, Im pretty sure I could go with that.
 
Top