low 6x6x6 SD

[gasmus]

It doesnt get much lower than this
http://www.worldcubeassociation.org/results/c.php?i=SantiagoOpen2009&allResults=1#666

i just had an average of 5 all within 8 secs and i thought that was low...

 

[Samlambert]

Wooooowww, now that's some good consistensy

 

[MistArts]

But Pedro's the man.

 

[Kian]

that's ridiculous. wow.

 

[masterofthebass]

You should see my latest average's SD, it's quite pitiful

 

[ccchips296]

wohh damn haha nice pedro XD but in the end, an SD that consistant doesnt mean much and could mean the solves were inconsistant....cuz of parities and what not...still pretty funny haha

 

[Pedro]

yeah, I have no idea how I got that

I had different parities on the solves...

but I suck at 6x6, so...

 

[hippofluff]

This reminds me of my times for westchester fall in 3x3. Just look at the consistency http://www.worldcubeassociation.org/results/p.php?i=2008RUTH01

 

[AvGalen]

This reminds me of my times for westchester fall in 3x3. Just look at the consistency http://www.worldcubeassociation.org/results/p.php?i=2008RUTH01

28.05 28.69 28.30 30.84 28.84

That is very consistent indeed, but even when we remove best and worst it is still 28.69 28.30 28.84 a 0.54 second difference on a 28.61 average which is about 1.9 percent.

This topic is about a 4:48.09 4:48.18 4:48.06 = 0.12 second difference on a 288.11 average which is about 0.04 percent

Pedro is 45 times as consistent as you were (and I am talking averages here. I don't calculate SD's but those numbers would be....wild)

But in the end only one thing is important:
30 Pedro Santos Guimarães 4:48.11
31 Arnaud van Galen 4:51.23
Compared to me, Pedro still is the man (but that WILL change this weekend )