loopover online puzzle

[THE_V01DL0RD]

49.907 mo3
5x5

 

[THE_V01DL0RD]

I wanna do a 2x2 - 5x5 relays

 

[THE_V01DL0RD]

2x2-0.000
3x3-9.790
4x4-38.564
5x5-54.648
Total-1:43.002

 

[Jorian Meeuse]

3BLD: 13.848
18 moves, 3 comms

Edit: 11.731, 2 algs with floating so had to think a little longer than usual. According to the replay it was already solved at 10.977 so apparently I take almost a second to click 'done' lol

 

[Deleted member 36445]

3BLD: 13.848
18 moves, 3 comms

Edit: 11.731, 2 algs with floating so had to think a little longer than usual. According to the replay it was already solved at 10.977 so apparently I take almost a second to click 'done' lol

I'm trying to do it but i have no background with bld but i think i know a way to solve 3bld

 

[Deleted member 36445]

For speed, numbers are best
For bld letters are best

 

[Jorian Meeuse]

Lol I got a 16.00 mean and each solve was 16 moves
(3BLD)

 

[Deleted member 36445]

This is fun! I always love these little puzzles you find @Filipe Teixeira, I still have the Tetravex app on my phone lol. So far my PB is 1:28 using Fringe/LBL (For those who don't do 15 puzzle, I've attached a screenshot from yt: s16269). What do y'all think the best input method is? I seem to be more accurate with using a mouse, but I can move faster on my phone.

thanks dude!

try this app with keyboard, maybe you can be faster with this input.

Loopover v1.2 - Cary Huang - OpenProcessing

v1.1 was 2 weeks old, and bad. Here's a better version.

openprocessing.org

space to hold the square and arrows to move. release space to move the square and move the next square you want

 

[Jorian Meeuse]

I might have the 3x3 WR now lol. 0.768 with a 5 mover
If you were to write the solution in rubiks cube notation it was just D' M' D' M' D'

 

[Deleted member 36445]

I might have the 3x3 WR now lol. 0.768 with a 5 mover
If you were to write the solution in rubiks cube notation it was just D' M' D' M' D'

Jeliks Memdegs

 

[THE_V01DL0RD]

No Regrips

 

[Jorian Meeuse]

5BLD first attempt was a success as well! 7:43.747, the memo was around 3:27. Exec was 144 moves, but I did many additional moves (like moving a side 3 times instead of twice in the other direction) for safety purposes.

 

[Mastermind2368]

thanks dude!

try this app with keyboard, maybe you can be faster with this input.

Loopover v1.2 - Cary Huang - OpenProcessing

v1.1 was 2 weeks old, and bad. Here's a better version.

openprocessing.org

space to hold the square and arrows to move. release space to move the square and move the next square you want

It'll probably take me a bit to get used to using keyboard, but that feels much better than touch input already. Mouse still might be better though, as that version seems more responsive

Also, maybe there's a built in way to change numbers on that site, but I couldn't find it, so I made a fork. Here's the link if anyone wants it. The spacing is a little weird for the double digit numbers, but I still prefer it.

 

[Jorian Meeuse]

My last few 3x3 solves:

 

[VincentCuber]

 

[THE_V01DL0RD]

I forgot to turn of the chromebook

 

[VincentCuber]

 

[VincentCuber]

Just got 0.000

 

[Jorian Meeuse]

Nooo I just looked at the replay of my first 3x3 solve and the scramble was solvable in 4 moves

 

[Caden Fisher]

Got a sub one on my sixth solve!