• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.

Loopover Methods

At my peak I was sub 1.9 on keyboard on 3x3 with the "BLFT" method you describe. LBL is not a viable method for speedsolving but it is one of the most viable compared to other methods I have researched. You can use LBL to one look solves and use efficient LBL-specific moves to create more efficient solutions. The 3x3 loopover is no skill but it is underrated and highly enjoyable even if scramble scumming is required for good averages at the high level.
 
At my peak I was sub 1.9 on keyboard on 3x3 with the "BLFT" method you describe. LBL is not a viable method for speedsolving but it is one of the most viable compared to other methods I have researched. You can use LBL to one look solves and use efficient LBL-specific moves to create more efficient solutions. The 3x3 loopover is no skill but it is underrated and highly enjoyable even if scramble scumming is required for good averages at the high level.
That's pretty impressive yo
 
At my peak I was sub 1.9 on keyboard on 3x3 with the "BLFT" method you describe. LBL is not a viable method for speedsolving but it is one of the most viable compared to other methods I have researched. You can use LBL to one look solves and use efficient LBL-specific moves to create more efficient solutions. The 3x3 loopover is no skill but it is underrated and highly enjoyable even if scramble scumming is required for good averages at the high level.
I'm sub 1.7 on mobile but keyboard's way more impressive
 
Back
Top