Let's see how far we've come

Language evolves. I don't see why it should be offensive at all, the word is being used with a different meaning.

Gay = Homosexuality.
Gay = Something bad.

Both statements are true, so isn't it logical to think that homosexuality = something bad? Which is obviously false?

Sure language evolves, but completely ignoring the importance of it and way terms are used is just stupid.

People are so easily offended in the forum...
 
Language evolves. I don't see why it should be offensive at all, the word is being used with a different meaning.

Gay = Homosexuality.
Gay = Something bad.

Both statements are true, so isn't it logical to think that homosexuality = something bad? Which is obviously false?

Sure language evolves, but completely ignoring the importance of it and way terms are used is just stupid.

People are so easily offended in the forum...

"Don't forget we live in two different location where ''popular slang'' words differ in meaning". Where I live, there is a large group of gay-rights activists, so only a handful of people use the definition of gay that you are using.

Therefore, when I hear you say "gay" to describe something stupid, it becomes offensive, because I was raised to not use "gay" to describe something stupid.
 
People are so easily offended in the forum...

People are so stupid in this forum.

On-topic:

I think there was a thread relatively recently about improvements in results and rankings over time, and there have been a couple recently marking how top 100 in 3x3 average became sub 13, and top 100 in BLD became sub 2:00. Considering how only recently these were WR material it's quite funny.
 
Code:
01:57:55 <+qqwref> right = clockwise
01:57:57 <+qqwref> right = correct
01:58:01 <+qqwref> clockwise = correct?!?!?! isn't it logical
01:58:04 <+keemy> tell him english isn't comutative
01:58:09 <+keemy> anerr
01:58:09 <+Kirjava> ahaha
01:58:12 <+keemy> transitive*
01:58:21 <+Kirjava> I'll just paste this log instead, you glorious bastards
 
Language evolves. I don't see why it should be offensive at all, the word is being used with a different meaning.

Gay = Homosexuality.
Gay = Something bad.

Both statements are true, so isn't it logical to think that homosexuality = something bad? Which is obviously false?

Sure language evolves, but completely ignoring the importance of it and way terms are used is just stupid.

People are so easily offended in the forum...

"Don't forget we live in two different location where ''popular slang'' words differ in meaning". Where I live, there is a large group of gay-rights activists, so only a handful of people use the definition of gay that you are using.

Therefore, when I hear you say "gay" to describe something stupid, it becomes offensive, because I was raised to not use "gay" to describe something stupid.
Ok ;)
 
Code:
01:57:55 <+qqwref> right = clockwise
01:57:57 <+qqwref> right = correct
01:58:01 <+qqwref> clockwise = correct?!?!?! isn't it logical
01:58:04 <+keemy> tell him english isn't comutative
01:58:09 <+keemy> anerr
01:58:09 <+Kirjava> ahaha
01:58:12 <+keemy> transitive*
01:58:21 <+Kirjava> I'll just paste this log instead, you glorious bastards

Replace 'logical' in my post with 'commonsensical', since that's what I meant. I'm not so stupid to think that english is 'transitive', but I guess I'm stupid enough to forget you'd take it literally.

Anyway, the crux of the argument is that creating a negative discourse around homosexuality is a bad thing. It doesn't matter what the intentions of the person using the word are, the fact is giving a word negative connotations that also relates to something like sexuality is harmful.

If (predominantly white) people started saying 'that's so black' or 'you're such a chinky' in all seriousness as an insult or to show that somethings negative, wouldn't that be perceived as wrong, not just 'an evolution of language'?

It's exactly the same thing with 'gay'. I don't care if you know so and so gay person who is okay with the term, the point is it's an insult originated from straight people hating gays.
 
If (predominantly white) people started saying 'that's so black' or 'you're such a chinky' in all seriousness as an insult or to show that somethings negative, wouldn't that be perceived as wrong, not just 'an evolution of language'?


Not if it was generally accepted that the intended meaning of 'black' in that context had drifted to 'bad'. There would be no racial implication in that statement, in the same way that there are no sexual ones in calling something gay.

Sure, I can see how it can be received as offensive though. I'm so desensitised to everything that I am so rarely offended these days, and find it extremely difficult to relate to people who are.
 
Back
Top