Kalindu Sachintha Wijesundara19.67 FMC MEAN -

Status
Not open for further replies.
And also, I think all religious people from any/most religions will take that as an offence.
Along the lines of this, I won't make fun of your religion, and you shouldn't make fun of my religion (though obviously it's fine to disagree)

Back on topic, is it at least somewhat plausible that the reason Kalindu was checking such long DRs is because he isn't as good at FMC and those are normal DRs for him to check? And that he actually got really lucky finishes?
Given that things like 2 LL skips in a row have happened before, an official 1 in a million fluke has got to happen eventually right?
 
Along the lines of this, I won't make fun of your religion, and you shouldn't make fun of my religion (though obviously it's fine to disagree)

Back on topic, is it at least somewhat plausible that the reason Kalindu was checking such long DRs is because he isn't as good at FMC and those are normal DRs for him to check? And that he actually got really lucky finishes?
Given that things like 2 LL skips in a row have happened before, an official 1 in a million fluke has got to happen eventually right?
Yes, but he also boasts sub-20 means on online comps such as I think it’s called FMC weekly? It may be possible that Kalindu is trying to sell the idea that he is that good and not that this is a fluke.
I have heard from Sri Lankan cubers on Reddit that he has insane results at home.
 
Yes, but he also boasts sub-20 means on online comps such as I think it’s called FMC weekly? It may be possible that Kalindu is trying to sell the idea that he is that good and not that this is a fluke.
I have heard from Sri Lankan cubers on Reddit that he has insane results at home.
Or maybe he is good at FMC and gets these times at home
 
Thats not something thats "Wrong with the Cubing Community nowadays". Thats just a handful of people behaving like attention seeking kids on the forum. Extrapolating a handful of people to thousands of cubers is bs.
Seriously, just because a few stupid kids (me included) acted immature doesn’t mean we can stereotype the whole community to be like this, people act a lot differently online than offline.
 
Seriously, just because a few stupid kids (me included) acted immature doesn’t mean we can stereotype the whole community to be like this, people act a lot differently online than offline.
100%. I know a few people who are quiet and withdrawn in real life, or behave normally/aren’t very aggressive, but the second they’re online they become a menace. Example doesn’t really fit in but shows the ‘duality’ thing that’s going on
 
Yes, but he also boasts sub-20 means on online comps such as I think it’s called FMC weekly? It may be possible that Kalindu is trying to sell the idea that he is that good and not that this is a fluke.
I have heard from Sri Lankan cubers on Reddit that he has insane results at home.
It’s also much easier to cheat in an online FMC attempt.
 
Iirc, he became a Delegate 2 months ago. Also a bit more than 2 months ago, his PR average in FMC was 33, PR single 28.
PR single was 22 bro, what r u talking about. And he couldn't get a good mean cause the Sri Lankans comps only had 1 solve available
 
To the people who r saying **** about India, just know that he isn't Indian, he's Sri Lankan and u r being very offensive. Coming from a Sri Lankan btw.
 
Back on topic, is it at least somewhat plausible that the reason Kalindu was checking such long DRs is because he isn't as good at FMC and those are normal DRs for him to check? And that he actually got really lucky finishes?
Given that things like 2 LL skips in a row have happened before, an official 1 in a million fluke has got to happen eventually right?
1 in a million is nothing here. It is insanely much luckier than that. Even for such short finishes for his DRs to EXIST is less than 1 in a million by quite a lot (I dont think we know how much exactly but none of the 1 million simulated means got even close). Plus finding all of those would be unlikely even for a world class FMCer. And if we assume that Kalindu is not that good in FMC, finding all of those becomes insanely unlikely as well. And according to his notes he found those optimal finishes after checking only very few possibilities which makes it even more insanely unlikely.

And on the other hand if we assume that Kalindu is actually really good at FMC, then why did he use such long DRs and RZPs? And why did he check so few EOs? He claims that he averages 22 at home. There is no way he does that by using those kind of DRs and checking so few EOs.
 
1716916071976.png


this did not age well
 
Why didn’t you guys seem suspicious when he got his 20.67 mean? Is it maybe that because it’s a WR that has gone to someone you think undeserving you seem to look in to it more. Also yeah i agree he cheated but seeing this sudden change is crazy.
The 20.67 mean was on the same day immediately before the 19.67 mean, so there just wasn't that much time for many people in different timezones to be suspicious. People would have likely still been suspicious after going through the solutions though as 20.67 would still be WR2, but it wouldn't have been as much widespread attention obviously because of WR vs. NR.
 
Why didn’t you guys seem suspicious when he got his 20.67 mean? Is it maybe that because it’s a WR that has gone to someone you think undeserving you seem to look in to it more. Also yeah i agree he cheated but seeing this sudden change is crazy.
Oh, several people were suspicious on the FMC discord server right after the reconstructions from the first 20.67 mean were posted. In the first solve he uses 7 move RZP for example which is something the top level solvers wouldn't even look at in the first place. And on top of that he even uses time to NISS for that really unpromising looking RZP which is even much stranger and something no reasonable solver would do. I personally argued for benefit of doubt at that point but after he posted his notes it became quite clear that he has cheated.
 
Why didn’t you guys seem suspicious when he got his 20.67 mean? Is it maybe that because it’s a WR that has gone to someone you think undeserving you seem to look in to it more. Also yeah i agree he cheated but seeing this sudden change is crazy.
The better a result is, the more eyes are on it and the more people care about it. It is just logical that WRs are examined with more scrutiny than other results. It is most certainly true that some official results were not achieved by legit means, but they were just not relevant for anyone to notice something, because no one cared.
 
It's all messed up. Not liking someone's branch algs on a piece of paper, or their other scribbled algs doesn't make someone a cheat.
Being a cheat requires proof beyond reasonable doubt.
Prove he cheated with evidence he saw scrambles in advance. Or it's a legitimate WR.

🙂 🙃 🤩 🏏
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top