Harris Chan
Member
the ZZ method (Mitchell and I :
1F and DB solved
2:Orient the edges so that the F2L can be solved with L, U, R moves.
3:Either solve DL and DR to make a cross then do Fridrich F2L,
OR use block building.
4 option a: Use Winter Variation to insert the last paired C/E and OLL simultaneously .
option b: Insert the last CE pair and ELL simultaneously.
5 option a: After Winter Variation, do PLL to solve.
option b: After ELL, do CLL (that doesn't affect the ELL)
The good thing about this method is that the algos are actually all found already, so no need of going to the ACube or Cube Explorer to trying to find a new sets of algos. CLL that doesn't affect ELL can be found in Andy Camann's website. Winter Variation is somewhere...hehe.
The other good thing is that Fridrich solvers and Block-building solvers can use this method. It could be intuitive F2L, or Fridrich with no rotation at all. The avg moves of this method is yet to be calculated. Supposedly it could avg at around 45 moves,
Any ideas?
1F and DB solved
2:Orient the edges so that the F2L can be solved with L, U, R moves.
3:Either solve DL and DR to make a cross then do Fridrich F2L,
OR use block building.
4 option a: Use Winter Variation to insert the last paired C/E and OLL simultaneously .
option b: Insert the last CE pair and ELL simultaneously.
5 option a: After Winter Variation, do PLL to solve.
option b: After ELL, do CLL (that doesn't affect the ELL)
The good thing about this method is that the algos are actually all found already, so no need of going to the ACube or Cube Explorer to trying to find a new sets of algos. CLL that doesn't affect ELL can be found in Andy Camann's website. Winter Variation is somewhere...hehe.
The other good thing is that Fridrich solvers and Block-building solvers can use this method. It could be intuitive F2L, or Fridrich with no rotation at all. The avg moves of this method is yet to be calculated. Supposedly it could avg at around 45 moves,
Any ideas?