Introducing CTLL: A Novel Simplified Approach to ZBLL

[4Chan]

Oh hey, nice to see you around again

Hay qq, everyone's so welcoming, this feels so nice !

 

[Ranzha]

Haven't seen your face around these parts for ages! Glad to see this idea being developed.

 

[mDiPalma]

doing OLL twice instead of doing OLL+PLL?

sounds legit

 

[pdilla]

This is friggen awesome. I can't wait to see both yours and Kirjava's work on this. It'll make learning those funky ZBLLs a lot more joyous.

doing OLL twice instead of doing OLL+PLL?

sounds legit

If recog can get as fast as regular LL recog, then the seamless gap between the two OLLs would be faster.

 

[IQubic]

I hate to be a downer, but as much as I like this idea you and me probably use different OLLs. Although two algs might work for the same OLL they will result in a different permutation. As much as this seems cool, I don't want to re-learn my OLLs just to match your pairings.

 

[Bindedsa]

I hate to be a downer, but as much as I like this idea you and me probably use different OLLs. Although two algs might work for the same OLL they will result in a different permutation. As much as this seems cool, I don't want to re-learn my OLLs just to match your pairings.

Chris said there are less than 200 algorithms, so it's probably well over 150. So if your not even willing to look at a few new OLLs, why would you think this is for you?

 

[irontwig]

There's really no set amount of algs. It's more of a general approach. Also, I find it quite funny that Chris even commented on the following thread, and then 4 and a half years later decided to call basically the same thing CTLL: https://www.speedsolving.com/forum/showthread.php?22254-Idea-for-CFOP-users-learning-ZBLL ...and that was just a obvious extension of Lars' idea which is even older.