Inefficiency

Cubing is the same. Three weeks is NOTHING.
Of course, that applies to almost every hobby (see this). The question is, why do so many beginners assume cubing is really easy and they'll get fast in no time? And when they don't, why are they honestly wondering what they're doing wrong, instead of realizing that -- just like all other things -- cubing really does take time and practice to get good at?
 
lol with the Violin analogy.
In case you didn't catch that, the key here is practice.
Try to look for your next pieces you'll need while you solve, not with pauses.

Yeah, I did find it pretty funny but I see what you're saying. My new PB is 1:03 but I had sune, U perm and the cross was half done when I started so you could say that was a lucky solve.

And no, I don't think cubing is super-easy and that I'll be able to get super-fast after 3 weeks. My point was that it seemed like I was doing everything right and people who weren't were still getting faster times.
 
It's a combination of turn speed, move efficiency, and delays, really. You usually don't realize it during solving, but you have a lot of delays between steps, and cutting down on that will help you a lot. Leyan Lo pointed out to me a while back that if you take just half a second after each step in Fridrich to look for pieces, you have already wasted 3 seconds, which is a lot for someone around the 20 second mark. Getting your delays down will come with practice - right now you might take a second or two to recognize a sune and put it in the right place to start the algorithm, but as you get better you will be able to see it in a fraction of a second. You might even be able to go into the algorithm immediately because you were watching the last layer pieces during the previous step and could predict that it would be a sune.

That's the way cubing is in general, I think, you unconsciously learn things just by practicing, often without even realizing it. Then, once you know them and have mastered them, you find it hard to believe you were ever as slow as you were! I would have to deliberately waste time to solve a 3x3 in a minute, even with the beginner's method, and yet I know that at one point that would have been an excellent time for me.
 
I have a similar problem.

I've been playing the violin for about three weeks but I just can't seem to get through "Flight of the Bumblebee" at full speed and the allegro non molto from in Winter from Vivaldi's Four Seasons continues to elude me. I just don't understand how people play them better than me with inferior technique and an inferior instrument.

I'm tired of people telling me to practice, what should I do?

METRONOME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It will be your best friend.
 
I've been cubing for 5 months 30 minutes to an hour a day, and all I have to show for it is AVG of 0:50.

I'm sure by now you're quite familiar with your method ... but how many pauses do you have in your solves? They really do make a huge difference. Currently I'm averaging about 35sec and probably capable of about 6tps, but then I tried slowing right down to just over 1 tps (72bpm) for every move in the solve and was surprised to be getting an average of just 45 sec. The key is lookahead - make sure you know what you have next and how you're going to solve it before you finish what you're working on. If you're unable to do this, slow down your turning rate until you can. You'll find its really hard to do to start with, but that's good - it means you're learning ;)
 
Last edited:
But the thing that really confuses me is this. How are people getting better times than me, when they are clearly using an inferior method on an inferior cube? I've heard of sub-40 times with the beginner's method. How is that even possible?

I think about this every time my brother beats me using his Dan Brown method (he averages anywhere from 23 to 38), when I'm using almost full Fridrich...

It's insane, I know, but I know that his Last Layer is almost as fast as any pro -- his corner orientation (last step) can be sub-2 if he knows what he's doing (which is 90% of the time - his TPS for the last step can be anywhere from 6TPS to about 12).

He's even able to beat me on inferior cubes too, it just goes to show you how it really doesn't matter what method you use... the better you are at understanding it, the faster you will be.
 
the difference is how much room for improvement and the time that is required. LBL, for example, takes longer to get amazing times on than full Fridrich. i have been cubing for 5 months, and use f2l, 4LLL and have a 35 s average of 5.
 
I have gotten a bit better.
Here's my times now:

PB (lucky): 53
PB (non-lucky): 58
Average: Anywhere from 1:05-1:15 (anything above that is a bad solve)
 
Back
Top