How many cubers have achieved sub-3 on 2x2?

[Rubiks560]

Yeah. That's what I was thinking.

 

[Coolster01]

Saw the OH thread, reminded me of this

I'm happy to join this xD 1.77

Shouldn't it be sub 2? lol

EDIT: Yeah, didnt see what you guys said there before I posted haha. 2.10 ao100 hopefully ill get sub2 soon

 

[Antonie faz fan]

I have got a 2.43 avg 12 with a phone time

 

[Rubiks560]

And for some odd reason I am highly doubting you.

 

[Coolster01]

Who? I think I'm legit but call me a liar if you want

The ao12 is on youtube and I got low 2.0x ao50 on cam but too long and not PB to upload and 1.914 ao25 should I do those?

 

[Antonie faz fan]

Whoops just realised made a typo LOL i meant 2.63.
And for the people saying it is hard confusing 4 and 6 i answer that it isnt on a iPhone

 

[ILMZS20]

i dont do much 2x2 and im sub 6 with ortega does that count as half sub 3 ( this "joke" was so bad i cant even believe i did that)

 

[bronycuber1013]

i average sub 2.8-3.2.

 

[Rubiks560]

Who? I think I'm legit but call me a liar if you want

The ao12 is on youtube and I got low 2.0x ao50 on cam but too long and not PB to upload and 1.914 ao25 should I do those?

Not you. I fully believe how fast you are. I meant Antoine Faz Fan.

 

[Tim Major]

2.43 ao12 by Antonie Faz Fan? Believable IMO.
Now bronycuber averaging SUB 2.8-3.2 ... not so sure.

 

[Coolster01]

Not you. I fully believe how fast you are. I meant Antoine Faz Fan.

Thanks. For a phone timer, I think it's quite plausible to get 2.63 though.

 

[Rubiks560]

Thanks. For a phone timer, I think it's quite plausible to get 2.63 though.

It's not just that. He just has a history of trying to pull BS on everyone.

 

[uyneb2000]

I average 2.7-2.8.

 

[kcl]

oh goody I have a sub 3 like all the cool kids now

2.98 ao12.

 

[cubernya]

I have just added 2x2 to CubingStats (see here). Unfortunately, the times are taken only from this thread, so most of them are nearly 3 years old. If you have achieved a time, please submit it to keep it up to date.

 

[scottishcuber]

I have just added 2x2 to CubingStats (see here). Unfortunately, the times are taken only from this thread, so most of them are nearly 3 years old. If you have achieved a time, please submit it to keep it up to date.

Cool. I've just submitted my avg. Any chance of expanding to include avg100? I know for 2x2 it is a very good indicator and I'd really like to see a list of the top 2x2ers to see where I rank.

 

[cubernya]

Cool. I've just submitted my avg. Any chance of expanding to include avg100? I know for 2x2 it is a very good indicator and I'd really like to see a list of the top 2x2ers to see where I rank.

I might add a separate page for avg100 on 2x2 (with the difference obviously being noted). The bad things it wouldn't have as many people at first, since most people don't look at the site too often.

 

[scottishcuber]

I might add a separate page for avg100 on 2x2 (with the difference obviously being noted). The bad things it wouldn't have as many people at first, since most people don't look at the site too often.

That's cool. I've chatted with Chris about getting an updated list going before, but I didn't really know where to start and was a bit lazy anyway.

 

[cubernya]

That's cool. I've chatted with Chris about getting an updated list going before, but I didn't really know where to start and was a bit lazy anyway.

Updated list for 12 or 100? It would be nice, since I know people just like to know who is ahead of them if nothing else.

The only thing is: What to set the limit as for avg100? Still 2.5?

Edit: I just added it as a preliminary 2.5, which can be changed very easily. Since the system doesn't like it with no times, I added a placeholder.

 

[scottishcuber]

Updated list for 12 or 100? It would be nice, since I know people just like to know who is ahead of them if nothing else.

The only thing is: What to set the limit as for avg100? Still 2.5?

Edit: I just added it as a preliminary 2.5, which can be changed very easily. Since the system doesn't like it with no times, I added a placeholder.

Both. With avg25/50 as well maybe (+ stackmat and keyboard labels)

I guess we only discussed it briefly on this thread:

Big bump.

I think it would be cool to see how many people have achieved sub 2.3 AO100 now.

Maybe we should have each category being intervals of 0.1s, because there is a big difference between a 2x2er that has a 2.3 avg100 and a 1.9.

So there would be sub- 1.8, 1.9, 2.0 etc. up to 2.5 maybe.

Yeah. That's what I was thinking.

I suppose 2.50 would be good.