Hello from a new old guy

rwfellows

Member
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
0
Glad to have just joined this forum, and looking forward to getting my 3x3 time under a minute. My first cube solve was in 1982; took half a day using Bossert's book. Since then I have brought my time down to about 2 minutes using the Fridrich F2L with my own homegrown OLL/PLL. I'm now working on the more modern 2-look OLL/PLL algorithms to get my time down more.

Maybe later I'll get into 1-look OLL/PLL, but learning more than 70 algorithms is kind of scary!

I also enjoy working 2x2, 4x4, 5x5, 6x6, and 7x7 cubes, but I'm not very fast.

Dick Fellows
 
Good to have you around. Practise is far more important than learning more algorithms if you want to get faster. Go hard, sub30 will be a breeze for you before you know it!
 
About 1 1/2 minutes. Not much better than my 3x3 time--I use a rather crude technique: solve the first layer (white), get the bottom layer pieces permuted, then orient the bottom layer pieces individually.
 
Welcome and good luck! I am not as old an old guy as you, but I never picked up a cube until this year at age 30, but I figure it's never too late to learn. I agree, Ortega's not bad. I had it down in a few days, and can usually get under 20 seconds even with my slow turning. Plus if you want to learn full PLL, a couple of the algorithms are the same (T and Y-perms, for instance).
 
Hi.
Like others, I definitely recommend learning Ortega for 2x2. It's easy to learn (12 algs; less as most of the OLL's are the same as 3x3), and it can be very fast (I have sub-6 averages with it). The first step is also quite easy. Here is a link to probably the best guide: http://www.kungfoomanchu.com/guides/andy-klise-2x2x2-speedcubing-guide-v2.pdf. The distinguishing patterns on the last step are very useful. When you're familiar with the method, I recommend going colour neutural. It's really easy compared to other methods and makes the first step easier still. Hope this helped.
 
Back
Top