[OcR] Feliks Zemdegs 5.66 3x3 single (7.19 average)

[Sajwo]

you should upload 5.86 too

 

[Brest]

Feliks Zemdegs - 5.66 3x3 OcR single - Melbourne Summer 2014

Spoiler: Video

[youtubehd]MX9Czdu5pyk[/youtubehd]

U F D2 F' R B L2 B2 U2 L2 U' D2 F' R2 B' D2 F2 D2

y2 x // inspection
R2' D' R2 // cross
U' y' R U R' U' R U R' // 1st pair
L' U L U' L U L' // 2nd pair
y' R U R' d' R' U' R // 3rd pair
U L' U' L // 4th pair
U r' U2' R U R' U' R U R' U r // OLL
U' U' x R2' D2 R U R' D2 R U' R // PLL
View at alg.garron.us

[B]Step	Time	STM	stps	ETM	etps[/B]
[COLOR="red"]Total	5.66	51	9.01	55	9.72	[/COLOR]	[B][SIZE="4"]%[/SIZE]
							Step		Time	STM	ETM[/B]
Cross+1	1.25	11	8.80	12	9.60		Cross+1/F2L	38.5%	37.9%	38.7%
F2L	3.25	29	8.92	31	9.54		F2L/Total	57.4%	56.9%	56.4%
LL	2.41	22	9.13	24	9.96		LL/Total	42.6%	43.1%	43.6%

 

[ilikecubing]

So frickin fazt

 

[AmazingCuber]

congrats faz, this is awesome! Too bad it isn't WR

 

[XTowncuber]

All 3 of his averages at this comp were sub-mats. Somebody catch up to this kid.

Faz, get a haircut.

 

[MatejMuzatko]

If someone (regardless if it's the same person) ties an NR, CR, or WR, that NR, CR, or WR will tie for the NR, CR, WR. That's why before Christian Kaserer's 0.69 2x2 WR single, there were three 2x2 WR holders, and not just the most recent one. So, the CR will still be 5.66, but there is a new 5.66 that will tie with the one from 2011.

What to do with World Ranking now? I see that the still the first one is in there... That depends on what?

 

[Sajwo]

You own top10 now

 

[moralsh]

Fun fact: If I'm correct, faz now has 41 sub-7 singles to his name. Second is Mats and Alex Lau with 9 each.

Another fun fact:
[table="width: 500" ]
[tr]
[td][/td]
[th]Feliks[/th]
[th]Rest of the world[/th]
[/tr]
[tr]
[th]<6[/th]
[td]5[/td]
[td]2[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[th]>6 & <7[/th]
[td]41[/td]
[td]49[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]

 

[Stefan]

What to do with World Ranking now? I see that the still the first one is in there... That depends on what?

You mean this, where it only says "Melbourne Winter Open 2011"? I'm aware of that and might be changing it soon, although I haven't decided how. It's more problematic for averages, as we show their up to five singles as well, so it becomes a space problem. Similarly FMC, where there's a larger chance to repeat records multiple times.

On what does it depend which one is shown? I'd have to check, but I think the internal result id. Which tends to increase over time, so most likely always the earliest occurrence is shown.

 

[MatejMuzatko]

You mean this, where it only says "Melbourne Winter Open 2011"? I'm aware of that and might be changing it soon, although I haven't decided how. It's more problematic for averages, as we show their up to five singles as well, so it becomes a space problem. Similarly FMC, where there's a larger chance to repeat records multiple times.

On what does it depend which one is shown? I'd have to check, but I think the internal result id. Which tends to increase over time, so most likely always the earliest occurrence is shown.

I think that good system would be that average with better "best solve" is shown and for single - the single that is part of better average....

 

[Stefan]

I think that good system would be that average with better "best solve" is shown and for single - the single that is part of better average....

You mean because that kinda shows the better overall achievement? But then I'd argue that for example 5.66 in 2011 was a better achievement than it is in 2014, because times have been improving and it was harder to get the same result earlier. I'm for example also somewhat proud that I'm still #6 for clock in Germany with my record from 2005, and it's one reason I don't practice and beat it now, as it feels more impressive than if I had a slightly better time from 2014

 

[MatejMuzatko]

I'm for example also somewhat proud that I'm still #6 for clock in Germany with my record from 2005, and it's one reason *I don't practice and beat it now, as it feels more impressive* than if I had a slightly better time from 2014

That's very cool, never thought like that

 

[amostay2004]

Jesus christ. That was ridiculous.

Fun fact: If I'm correct, faz now has 41 sub-7 singles to his name. Second is Mats and Alex Lau with 9 each.

What the hell.

Offtopic: What happened to Alex? Don't see him around anymore..is he on hiatus or something?

Amazing as always, Feliks. The LL on this was harder than on the previous 5.66, and no X-cross too. Definitely good chances at WR with a little bit more luck

 

[Akiro]

If I'm right th is also his first comp with no sup-10 in 3x3 in all three rounds!
:tu

 

[CHJ]

Offtopic: What happened to Alex? Don't see him around anymore..is he on hiatus or something?

alex is lame, he barely cubes anymore, he still is capable of sub7 (and sub6 on the odd scramble) but he only goes to whatever comp if his dumb school doesn't make him go in on a weekend

 

[uberCuber]

You own top10 now

Oh cool we're back to 2011 again

Faz, get a haircut.

This was my first thought when I watched the video

and it's one reason I don't practice and beat it now, as it feels more impressive than if I had a slightly better time from 2014

Well that's why instead of just getting a slightly better time, you should just completely smash it and become Stefan Clockmann again!

 

[Crazycubemom]

Congrats Feliks.

New Hair style and New Record
Maybe with Bob Marley's style you can beat 5.55 haahahahahh.

 

[Dene]

Faz, get a haircut.

nowai! Long hair ftw

 

[Frubix]

Mind=Blown