[Unofficial] Feliks Zemdegs - 40,000 subscribers video: 41* sub-6 solves

[kcl]

I see lots of mind blowing finger tricks in f2l, may have to steal some of those.

 

[DanpHan]

Feliks so deserves the world record 3x3 single! He beat it almost 10 times in the video!

Feliks has had it soooo many times...
Someone else needs to have it.

 

[Stefan]

Feliks has had it soooo many times...

Actually just once.

 

[DanpHan]

Actually just once.

Well, yeah, but he's broken his own single a lot of times, and either way, he had it for quite a while.

 

[rowehessler]

Actually just once.

really?

 

[IRNjuggle28]

really?

Yeah. Nobody came between 7.03 and 5.66 except himself.

Also, I can't reconstruct. I was going to do some of them but I'm finding Feliks to be faster than I can manage, even in slow motion.

 

[kunparekh18]

If anyone reconstructs please mention the cross colour in the solve...

 

[Musicalboy2]

If anyone reconstructs please mention the cross colour in the solve...

a) I kinda want to reconstruct, but I'm quite busy... it'd be a lot easier with scrambles, of course.

b) If you want to follow solves with a different cross colour, either put in a "different" colour scheme into alg.cubing/equivalent (or put rotations in the beginning of the scramble) or scramble with a different orientation.

 

[kunparekh18]

a) I kinda want to reconstruct, but I'm quite busy... it'd be a lot easier with scrambles, of course.

b) If you want to follow solves with a different cross colour, either put in a "different" colour scheme into alg.cubing/equivalent (or put rotations in the beginning of the scramble) or scramble with a different orientation.

Figuring out the orientation is hard sometimes XD I invert the rotations before the solve, before I scramble, but when there are x rotations in the cross it doesn't work lol

 

[Iggy]

That's pretty fast...

 

[AvGalen]

Actually just once.

I don't think that is the way most people look at it. When you break your own WR you have it again, not "just once". Otherwise what would happen if someone breaks your WR, but you break it back immediately so the other person never had it?
Or in other words: Did Sergey Bubka only have the WR once? Was he also World Champion only once?

I also think that "He had the WR so many time, somebody else should have it" is horrible logic.

 

[Please Dont Ask]

This is not with stackmat tho.

Would'nt it be easier in a stack mat compared the keyboard?????

 

[Stefan]

When you break your own WR you have it again, not "just once".

I definitely don't think you have it again. "Again" sounds like you didn't have it for a while. If at all, I'd say you "still" have WR. So just once. The problem is the word "have" (or "hold"), it seems unfit to express what was meant.

Anyway, my actual reason for posting was that I hadn't realized Feliks' string of WRs and that Mats is the only one who beat him (though if I had thought about it, I might have guessed it) and I felt like pointing that out.

 

[AvGalen]

I definitely don't think you have it again. "Again" sounds like you didn't have it for a while. If at all, I'd say you "still" have WR. So just once. The problem is the word "have" (or "hold"), it seems unfit to express what was meant.

Anyway, my actual reason for posting was that I hadn't realized Feliks' string of WRs and that Mats is the only one who beat him (though if I had thought about it, I might have guessed it) and I felt like pointing that out.

yeah, we both didn't express well what we meant. Language is so bothersome.
The string of WR's that don't get interupted is actually REALLY the norm in 3x3x3. Only Edouard and Erik have only reclaimed their lost WR's for single and nobody has ever done it for average.

 

[CriticalCubing]

I see lots of mind blowing finger tricks in f2l, may have to steal some of those.

Make a video of it then He was going so fast that I couldnt see a thing until OLL was done!