Dumb Cubing Challenges.

[moh_33]

Then why did you post it in a challenge thread when it's impossible haha

I posted that because its impossible XD

(nothing else nothing more)

 

[Jam88]

This is now just unrealistic, completely impossible challenges, not dumb challenges.

sorry

 

[Nmile7300]

I posted that because its impossible XD

(nothing else nothing more)

Dude that's not funny, this thread is for DUMB cubing challenges not impossible ones.

 

[Jam88]

solve a 3x3 face by face like jperm did

 

[brododragon]

I would actually say impossible for a human but okay then

Wouldn't it be simpler than CFOP SpeedBLD because less moves mean less piece tracking? I do see commutators being a bit of a headache, though. If 70 MBLD is possible, though, so is this.

Solve a cube but the number of half turns that you make on the face that you choose is determined by the roll of a d6.

That's actually impossible because not everything can be solved with half moves. Did you mean quarter?

 

[Username: Username:]

Wouldn't it be simpler than CFOP SpeedBLD because less moves mean less piece tracking? I do see commutators being a bit of a headache, though. If 70 MBLD is possible, though, so is this.

That's actually impossible because not everything can be solved with half moves. Did you mean quarter?

blockbuilding is really hard to track tbh, and because Heise is very intuitive, it will be very hard to figure out things like solving 5 edges + 2 corners which is insane and EO which is super duper uber mega hard while tracking or exec ig, CFOP is *very* straight forward, just make a cross, no blockbuilding or EO, finish F2L, not so easy but doable, track LL pieces and predict the LL cases.

 

[brododragon]

5 edges + 2 corners which is insane and EO which is super duper uber mega hard while tracking or exec ig.

Well, with more beginner approaches, like 2 comms for 5 edges 2 corners and F2L after blockbuilding it's wayyyy simpler.

 

[Username: Username:]

Well, with more beginner approaches, like 2 comms for 5 edges 2 corners and F2L after blockbuilding it's wayyyy simpler.

I feel even figuring out comms is a mess.

 

[brododragon]

I feel even figuring out comms is a mess.

Yeah, but so was 3BLD, 30 yrs ago.

 

[semiprime799]

Wouldn't it be simpler than CFOP SpeedBLD because less moves mean less piece tracking? I do see commutators being a bit of a headache, though. If 70 MBLD is possible, though, so is this.

That's actually impossible because not everything can be solved with half moves. Did you mean quarter?

Yeah I messed up there...

 

[Spacey10]

Hey guys, can we make a rule?
You only get to say a challenge if you actually did the challenge.
I am saying this because this thread could get confusing.
The most recent one was to dip two fingers in ketchup, then solve a 3x3, and show where the ketchup went on the cube.
If you agree to this, like this post, if you don't, react to this post with meh.

 

[Spacey10]

Sorry for double posting, but can someone do the ketchup things, I said the challenge so I cannot do it

 

[Owen Morrison]

Sorry for double posting, but can someone do the ketchup things, I said the challenge so I cannot do it

I might do it.

 

[Spacey10]

Welp this thread died, cuz of me
Whatever, next person solve a cube using only your index fingers
(Table abuse allowed (obviously))

 

[DuckubingCuber347]

Welp this thread died, cuz of me
Whatever, next person solve a cube using only your index fingers
(Table abuse allowed (obviously))

1:9.82 that's actually really fun!

Next: Solve a 3x3 with 2 separate 3x3's. you can turn the other two half way if you want to assist in turning the main cube. (But I found a way to turn it somewhat easily with out doing that). This one is not fun.

 

[Deleted member 36445]

solving with heise OH BLD is feasible, just demands a lot of commitment. as said before, people do speed bld, you would spend a while tracing all the pieces but it's possible.