[Unofficial] Dan Cohen 5x5 avg5 1:18.47

[masterofthebass]

Not that great, but o well.

 

[4weeksAndImSub60]

Wow... when I first started cubing you solved it as fast as I did a 3x3. BTW... is that the fastest known-method for big cubes? Or could you apply the same concept of fridrich to it?

 

[AvGalen]

How much time do you have to fake all those video's Dan

Wow... when I first started cubing you solved it as fast as I did a 3x3. BTW... is that the fastest known-method for big cubes? Or could you apply the same concept of fridrich to it?

Please tell us why you think that someone who breaks the WR by > 5 seconds wouldn't use the best method? (well, actually AVG-edges is arguably just as good)

You could use the same concept of Fridrich, but that would be a lot of "corner" edge-pairs and you would very soon have limit move-freedom. Solving with a layer-by-layer method is possible, but painfully slow

 

[4weeksAndImSub60]

How much time do you have to fake all those video's Dan

Wow... when I first started cubing you solved it as fast as I did a 3x3. BTW... is that the fastest known-method for big cubes? Or could you apply the same concept of fridrich to it?

Please tell us why you think that someone who breaks the WR by > 5 seconds wouldn't use the best method? (well, actually AVG-edges is arguably just as good)

You could use the same concept of Fridrich, but that would be a lot of "corner" edge-pairs and you would very soon have limit move-freedom. Solving with a layer-by-layer method is possible, but painfully slow

IDK where you get that 'WR by >5 secs' from. LOL

 

[Tomarse]

AvG Edges are what I use, very good if you and minimise setup moves and pauses (Help me arnaud) i can sub 2 and im not exactly amazing.

 

[ShadenSmith]

How much time do you have to fake all those video's Dan

Wow... when I first started cubing you solved it as fast as I did a 3x3. BTW... is that the fastest known-method for big cubes? Or could you apply the same concept of fridrich to it?

Please tell us why you think that someone who breaks the WR by > 5 seconds wouldn't use the best method? (well, actually AVG-edges is arguably just as good)

You could use the same concept of Fridrich, but that would be a lot of "corner" edge-pairs and you would very soon have limit move-freedom. Solving with a layer-by-layer method is possible, but painfully slow

IDK where you get that 'WR by >5 secs' from. LOL

Probably from here.

 

[pjk]

Nakijima could do better