THE_V01DL0RD
Legend
no, its More than that. it's multi step trignometryyou just have to know a square + b squared = c squared
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
no, its More than that. it's multi step trignometryyou just have to know a square + b squared = c squared
oh i see nevermindno, its More than that. it's multi step trignometry
"Algebra" like they teach in middle school is not real algebra yetalgebra is pretty fun right now imo
coming from someone who has been homeschooled her whole lifeHomeschool is the best response to the flaws of the public school system (as mentioned in some of the comments above. But the child has to be willing to work hard and learn and the parents have to fully commit to teaching their children. If both sides don't commit to this, that's when homeschooling seems to fail (it doesn't; the parents and child failed the process).
(aa)+(bb)=(cc)Do you like math?
Do you have a major in math?
wut? i haven't experienced anything?"Algebra" like they teach in middle school is not real algebra yet
oh man"Algebra" like they teach in middle school is not real algebra yet
wut? i haven't experienced anything?
Yep. Open up any book on Abstract Algebra like Dummit and Foote (actually I think the book is very dry so find another one)oh man
I'm scared of that, my brother (in University) told me that there are also "not real" numbers"Algebra" like they teach in middle school is not real algebra yet
I thought you were talking about osu! for a secondI know 7 digits and I don't need any more
if you think about it no number is actually realI'm scared of that, my brother (in University) told me that there are also "not real" numbers![]()
Did you know the real numbers are a lot more finnicky than the complex numbers? Real analysis is about how weird the reals are and complex analysis is about how nice the complex numbers areif you think about it no number is actually real
I'm in Intro to Linear Algebra right now, and we're just in the middle of talking about vector spaces, their properties, proving something is a subspace of a vector space, etc. I'm taking Abstract Algebra next semester, so this stuff looks fun (kinda sorta sarcasm lol).Yep. Open up any book on Abstract Algebra like Dummit and Foote (actually I think the book is very dry so find another one)
They probably lied to you and told you the rank of a matrix is the number of pivots in Gaussian elimination or something. And they didn't really tell you what the determinant is at all. It's such a bad way to understand it. Really a matrix is a linear map and the rank is the dimension of the image, that is the output vector space. And the so-called rank-nullity theorem follows as a consequence of the first isomorphism theorem.
View attachment 39163
I'm scared of that, my brother (in University) told me that there are also "not real" numbers![]()
I'm scared of that, my brother (in University) told me that there are also "not real" numbers![]()
Did you know the real numbers are a lot more finnicky than the complex numbers? Real analysis is about how weird the reals are and complex analysis is about how nice the complex numbers are
I actually recently wrote a paper for my History of Math class about imaginary/complex numbers. It is a very simple and relatively short (5 page) summary of how the idea came about and I also briefly touch on its use in Euler’s formula and electrical engineering. (If anyone wants to read my B- paper I can DM it to you lol)I strongly dislike the naming of numbers involving square roots of negatives as “imaginary”. It gives the impression that mathematicians are making things up just for the sake of it, when in reality they are a logically sound deduction for how to deal with the square roots of negative numbers. They’re even used in the real world, albeit with very specific applications (electrical engineering and certain high-level areas of physics, mainly).