Breaking sub-20s and avgs under 30sec?

Arnaud, whyyyyy

I remember when I was learning the 5x5, and it was taking me like 5 or 6 min, and I saw a video of you doing it in like 2:30 using keyhole, I thought it was the most ridiculous thing ever. Not ridiculous because it was so fast, which it was, but because you were still using keyhole. I didnt know that you still use it today, even on 3x3. Don't people tell you all the time to move on? I just don't get it. The only way I can see that you wouldnt advance is if you have some sort of serious learning disability, which I dont think is the case.. So whyyyy arnaud, please tell me its hurting my head.
 
Arnaud, whyyyyy

I remember when I was learning the 5x5, and it was taking me like 5 or 6 min, and I saw a video of you doing it in like 2:30 using keyhole, I thought it was the most ridiculous thing ever. Not ridiculous because it was so fast, which it was, but because you were still using keyhole. I didnt know that you still use it today, even on 3x3. Don't people tell you all the time to move on? I just don't get it. The only way I can see that you wouldnt advance is if you have some sort of serious learning disability, which I dont think is the case.. So whyyyy arnaud, please tell me its hurting my head.

I have tried intuitive CFOP F2L and did get better with it (reached 25 seconds) but at the same time my keyhole times went down to about 22. I hardly ever practise/train/learn algs so my improvements are slow. Everytim I decide to "finally learn all PLL" I get/buy another puzzle that I like better than "finally learning all PLL".

So why do I still use keyhole + 4 look last layer? Because it is the fastest method for me at the moment
 
Back
Top