Blindsolving Accomplishment Thread

[Keroma12]

2:36.79
memo and execution were both 1:18 lol
1st scramble from weekly
PB by 25 seconds

Edit:
55 second memo, first sub60! Too bad it was DNF (2:16.18)
I did memo correctly, but then I switched the order of the last 2 images, and so was off by 4 edges.

Edit2:
2:55.23

Never had a sub3 attempt before today, then my only 3 solves of the day are like this! Awesome

 

[Yes We Can!]

5/5 in 32 minutes. FINALLY!

 

[Johan444]

Official solve Time is around what I average.

 

[Tim Major]

D2 r2 R2 u2 B' u r F' r2 L2 u2 R' F2 U2 D L2 r2 F' u2 r2 u2 r2 R F' U F' U u D' f D' r' f2 B2 r' L R D r' R2
4bld
I memorised 8 centre targets yesterday, and the rest of the cube in about 30m today. However, this included getting breakfast, doing a few X-cube 4 solves, I just casually memorised, so the time hardly matters, more the fact I got it
My centres only took 2 locations, and my edges only took 3! 8 corner targets, so I did corners audio, with yperm, as 8 is a multiple of 4, so I knew the centres would be fine. I memorised centres->edges->corners. I executed corners->centres->edges.
Y-perm corners, T-perm centres, r2 edges.

 

[DennisStrehlau]

4x4x4 BLD - 07.00.95 mins

Soooo close to sub-7
But its ok. The solve had edge-parity and corner-parity. So without one of those two, it would have been clearly sub-7.

Dennis

 

[aronpm]

1:09.16

3x3 BLD with UF buffer, this was my third try. My first try was 1:31, and my second try was dnf 58 off by 3 edges

It's kinda nice, but I won't be switching for a while (or ever...)

 

[Zane_C]

2/2 in 2:01.70 . Would've been a whole lot happier if it was over 1.70 faster.

First cube journey, second cube normal (audio/visual).
Not sure what the memo was, after the first cube was memorised and reviewed it was 30 seconds.
I like it how my journey memo isn't much slower than my normal 3BLD memo.

D R D' B F L R' D2 L' R U L' D F2 L' R' D U' B2 D B' F' D' U' B
B' U' B L2 R' F D F2 U' F' D' R' B' U F L B2 L' B F' L2 B D U2 F

 

[Tim Major]

2/2 in 2:01.70 . Would've been a whole lot happier if it was over 1.70 faster.

Great job :tu
Michael needs to update http://mzrg.com/rubik/multi.shtml

I got a 3:12 success, my previous pb was 3:15, with Old Pochmann!

 

[aronpm]

4/4 in 4:49.46 (~2:25 memo)

Pretty good. Not gonna try again

1:12 total per cube, about 36s per cube for memo/exec.

I bet qq is sick of updating his list so much

 

[qqwref]

I bet qq is sick of updating his list so much

Depends, are you sick of doing multi so much?

 

[Yes We Can!]

2x2 Multi BLD 4/5 in 3:39.85.
Good fun actually Faulty cube was off by 2 corners and 2 flipped edges as well as 4 obliques and 3 x-Centers.

 

[ben1996123]

2x2 Multi BLD 4/5 in 3:39.85.
Good fun actually Faulty cube was off by 2 corners and 2 flipped edges as well as 4 obliques and 3 x-Centers.

lol?

Anyway, still cooll.

 

[Yes We Can!]

lol?

Anyway, still cooll.

I was just kidding because I found it kinda strange to say "off by 2 corners" as the 'corners' is redundant .

EDIT:
49.58 D R2 D F2 B' L' F D U' B' D' R' B' L2 U2 F2 B' D R F2 L' D' F2 U2 B2
First sub-50 and it's non-lucky
Finally! Nice scramble (edges).

EDIT2:
59.71, 1:03.51, 55.35, (1:08.84), (52.04) = 59.52 :O
First sub-1:10 avg!
The session went like this: 8 consecutive successes, 4 consecutive DNFs :/

 

[slocuber]

First success 3x3 BLD, also first try The solve was actually very easy, but it took about 10 mins, because I wanted a success on a first try
Also nice solve Cornelius.

 

[RyanReese09]

2:27.67[pb!!], DNF(1:22.71)[messed up on corners, gave up], 2:27.60[DNF, off by 5 edges. 3 of which cycled on M slice. 2 flipped], DNF(2:52.57)[didn't do parity. 2 corners twisted], 1:55.61[memo 58 execution the rest.FIRST SUB2 ;D]

From the blindfold race. Broke PB twice there.

The 1:55 was 58 memo, rest execution. No recall delays for the most part o.O.

 

[riffz]

1:09.16

3x3 BLD with UF buffer, this was my third try. My first try was 1:31, and my second try was dnf 58 off by 3 edges

It's kinda nice, but I won't be switching for a while (or ever...)

I considered learning UF buffer, but I chose DF over it not only because I could use M2 if I forgot a case, but I just found it much easier to make the comms. UF is great if you're going to take advantage of all the <R,U> 2-gen cases but I'm way too lazy for that so I'm sticking with DF.

Who knows, maybe I'll adopt multiple edge buffers some day and make a list of comms for DB. It actually wouldn't be that bad now that I think of it, and most cases would be almost the same as DF, since reflectin on S is really easy to do in your head.

 

[Zane_C]

59.71, 1:03.51, 55.35, (1:08.84), (52.04) = 59.52 :O

Nice! You're getting really fast.

 

[aronpm]

Did some comp-style bld, with paper covering the cube before starting and a stackmat, and I got this:

Average of 5: 34.20
35.41 (DNF 54.41) 34.33 (30.63) 32.86

 

[Tim Major]

lolcrazy.
You improve in huge jumps, I remember logging on and going on #rubik, and you'd dropped from like, 1:05~ to high 40s xD
Crazy.

 

[uberCuber]

Did some comp-style bld, with paper covering the cube before starting and a stackmat, and I got this:

Average of 5: 34.20
35.41 (DNF 54.41) 34.33 (30.63) 32.86

wtfast