byu
Veteran
Tyler beat me. I got a 49
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

@toast ,
That is amazingly fast for a first solve.(Though part of your speed can be attributed to your normal 3x3 speed). It took me 6 BLD solves to get even sub-6.What is the method you are using?
I used to do edges first when I used old pochmann, but it works both ways
I tested the "too good scramble", and it certainly was easy. I made 3:51, whick is a 90 sec better than my previus record.
i got sub-45... i think it can barely be called a "scramble"
Really? I use Computer Generated scramble
I tested the "too good scramble", and it certainly was easy. I made 3:51, whick is a 90 sec better than my previus record.
i got sub-45... i think it can barely be called a "scramble"
Really? I use Computer Generated scramble
oh, i was talking about the scramble from gparker.
And I'm talking about 3x3 BLD, not 2x2 BLD.![]()
I tested the "too good scramble", and it certainly was easy. I made 3:51, whick is a 90 sec better than my previus record.
i got sub-45... i think it can barely be called a "scramble"
Really? I use Computer Generated scramble
oh, i was talking about the scramble from gparker.
And I'm talking about 3x3 BLD, not 2x2 BLD.![]()
I tested the "too good scramble", and it certainly was easy. I made 3:51, whick is a 90 sec better than my previus record.
i got sub-45... i think it can barely be called a "scramble"
Really? I use Computer Generated scramble
oh, i was talking about the scramble from gparker.
And I'm talking about 3x3 BLD, not 2x2 BLD.![]()
yea mine was the first one of the day off of CCT. ive never seen an easeir real scramble
I tested the "too good scramble", and it certainly was easy. I made 3:51, whick is a 90 sec better than my previus record.
i got sub-45... i think it can barely be called a "scramble"
Really? I use Computer Generated scramble
oh, i was talking about the scramble from gparker.
And I'm talking about 3x3 BLD, not 2x2 BLD.![]()
yea mine was the first one of the day off of CCT. ive never seen an easeir real scramble
That was a CCT scramble? That's hard to believe![]()
I tested the "too good scramble", and it certainly was easy. I made 3:51, whick is a 90 sec better than my previus record.
i got sub-45... i think it can barely be called a "scramble"
Really? I use Computer Generated scramble
oh, i was talking about the scramble from gparker.
And I'm talking about 3x3 BLD, not 2x2 BLD.![]()
yea mine was the first one of the day off of CCT. ive never seen an easeir real scramble
That was a CCT scramble? That's hard to believe![]()
whats so special about a CCT scramble? it was just a random scramble for 3x3maybe i should have taken a screen shot
![]()
And someday, someone will get a CCT scramble that gives you a solved cube.
And someday, someone will get a CCT scramble that gives you a solved cube.
I doubt that.
5: 01:05.98 x
4: 01:26.83 x --- DNF
3: 01:12.74 x
2: 01:07.29 x
1: 01:11.05 x
average of 5 was 1:10.36. not bad without any practice![]()
at my next comp, I want the NR (currently 1:16.38) as my first success. I'll practise for that though![]()
Oh wow - that's mind-boggling. Congratulations! Just like that, you're one of the elite.hoho, today is a good day for BLD!
4x4 bld in 5:34.72 (2:40-2:50 memo), out of nowherehaven't practised since...well, I haven't really practised it ever. maybe 10th successful solve.
hoho, today is a good day for BLD! 4x4 bld in 5:34.72 (2:40-2:50 memo), out of nowherehaven't practised since...well, I haven't really practised it ever. maybe 10th successful solve.
hoho, today is a good day for BLD! 4x4 bld in 5:34.72 (2:40-2:50 memo), out of nowherehaven't practised since...well, I haven't really practised it ever. maybe 10th successful solve.
Holy Moses (or whatever applies) That is a fantastic time! Nice!
Then I almost dare not mention my efforts, but then again why not
I tried some 20 3x3 speedbld practise this morning (next comp is Saturday) with only
a little over 50% accuracy. Not too good, average only a little sub-3. But the two best
were 2:02.08(PB with 2 secs) and then 2:00.06
(again 2 secs). Now next PB
has got to be sub-2.
And good luck in västerås! I'm not coming![]()