[Unofficial] Andrew Brown 6.27 OH single

[cuber952]

 

[Tim Major]

Time for some flamin'

 

[tasguitar7]

oh my god that was incredible

 

[tozies24]

LL skip?

 

[JonnyWhoopes]

~20ish move scramble. Heh.

 

[amostay2004]

Sorry, I call fake. Fake-ish reaction, and if that was ZBLL it was pretty fast recognition.

 

[That70sShowDude]

Yeaaaaa, not believing this.

Whole warmup thing looked set up. Scramble really looked set up (super fast zbll recog). Reaction looked set up. Words to end the video looked set up. I think it's set up.

 

[aronpm]

~20ish move scramble. Heh.

qqTimer now delivers sub-optimal random-state 3x3 scrambles. Usually 19 to 21 moves (I've never seen more than 21)

But I don't believe that this solve is legit.

 

[tasguitar7]

that scramble admittedly did not look sub-optimal, and it is a little suspicious that he was already wearing a christmassy hat for the end of the video, but i'll give him benefit of the doubt until there is a piece of truly damning evidence

 

[Brest]

Spoiler: Video

[youtubewide]v_w4w8pnF7k[/youtubewide]

D2 R2 D2 L2 F2 R D L2 D F2 L R U' L2 D2 F2 R' F2

z2 // inspection
R2 U' R U' R z' // cross
U' R U R' U' R' U // 1st pair
U R' U' z' // 2nd pair
U' R U2' R' U' R U R' // 3rd pair
R' U' R U R' U' R // 4th pair
U' R' U2' R U R' U R // AntiSune
alg.garron

6.27sec : 38htm/6.06tps : 43etm/6.86tps

 

[Tim Major]

Sorry, I call fake. Fake-ish reaction, and if that was ZBLL it was pretty fast recognition.

It is "ZBLL".
Zomg I know ZBLL.

 

[Zane_C]

If this isn't a rehearsed solve, it's clearly an incredible feat.

Very fast ZBLL recognition is understandable (after loads of practice). However, what arouses my suspicion is this:

thank God i just finished learning sune RU ZBLL

If all of Andrew's solves are legit, and he wants people to believe the 'truth', surely he would place the monitor in view. His high quality camera would be able to capture the scrambles freshly generated, so everyone can see.

 

[Tim Major]

Brest, your reconstruction has multiple errors.
Not trying to be mean, trying to help.

 

[rowehessler]

Brest, your reconstruction has multiple errors.
Not trying to be mean, trying to help.

meanie.
anyway, this solve is complete horsepoop

 

[waffle=ijm]

Cuz not a lot of people know andrew brown...they immediately call fake...cmon people.

 

[rowehessler]

Cuz not a lot of people know andrew brown...they immediately call fake...cmon people.

i didnt say it was fake, im saying its horsepoop

 

[Tim Major]

Cuz not a lot of people know andrew brown...they immediately call fake...cmon people.

He never owned up to past fakes, so how can we trust him?

 

[tozies24]

there is a difference between easy and fake. I think that this solve was just incredibly easy. Anyone can get lucky...

 

[Weston]

I think its pretty obviously fake. Mainly because of the first pair. After he solves the cross, the corner and edge he solves first are on DRB and DB, yet he solves them without first turning the cube to see the pieces. I'm also pretty certain that he didn't predict the first pair because that first F2L pair he solved stayed on the bottom/back of the cube while he was inspecting.

 

[Mal]

Just give the guy some praise! He is obviously not fake cause he has gotten a 11.81 OH single official!