[Unofficial] All PLLs Sub 1.2 (0.90 Mean of 21) + E Perm 0.65 (UWR?)

[Hazelnut]

Cube : Zhanchi with mods

Order : A E F G H J N R T U V Y Z (Alphabetical lol)

Lube : Lubix with some Maru lube


E Perm MIGHT be +2 but I watched the slow-motion and I think it's good.

15/21 Sub 1 Will get 6 more very soon.

 

[drrubikscube]

just refresh the screen it didnt work for me the first time either

 

[god of rubic 2]

Insane.

 

[ben1996123]

0:55 delayed reaction.

Nice E perm.

 

[drewsopchak]

Time for video analysis

 

[Jaycee]

Holy wow. Awesome!

 

[Hazelnut]

Time for video analysis

I'm pretty sure some of them are +2s I'll try to redo all these

and film all sub 1 PLLs video later. (I'll go slightly slower to prove that I can actually sub 1 all of them completely)


V-Perm clarification

After I stopped the timer, I kinda moved the F face with my thumbs slightly but
before I move the F face, it was already under 45 degrees anyway so I think it's fine.

 

[Robert-Y]

Time for video analysis

[table="width: 500"]
[tr]
[td][/td]
[td]Stackmat time[/td]
[td]Video analysis time[/td]
[td]Difference[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Aa[/td]
[td]0.63[/td]
[td]0.767[/td]
[td]+0.137[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Ab[/td]
[td]0.66[/td]
[td]0.734[/td]
[td]+0.074[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]E[/td]
[td]0.65[/td]
[td]0.834[/td]
[td]+0.184[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]F[/td]
[td]1.18[/td]
[td]1.335[/td]
[td]+0.155[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Ga[/td]
[td]1.18[/td]
[td]1.268[/td]
[td]+0.088[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Gb[/td]
[td]1.08[/td]
[td]1.135[/td]
[td]+0.055[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Gc[/td]
[td]1.16[/td]
[td]1.235[/td]
[td]+0.075[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Gd[/td]
[td]0.97[/td]
[td]1.202[/td]
[td]+0.232[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]H[/td]
[td]0.68[/td]
[td]0.834[/td]
[td]+0.154[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Ja[/td]
[td]0.81[/td]
[td]0.868[/td]
[td]+0.058[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Jb[/td]
[td]0.71[/td]
[td]0.834[/td]
[td]+0.124[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Na[/td]
[td]0.97[/td]
[td]1.034[/td]
[td]+0.064[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Nb[/td]
[td]0.97[/td]
[td]1.101[/td]
[td]+0.131[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Ra[/td]
[td]1.06[/td]
[td]1.168[/td]
[td]+0.108[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Rb[/td]
[td]0.97[/td]
[td]1.135[/td]
[td]+0.165[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]T[/td]
[td]0.78[/td]
[td]0.801[/td]
[td]+0.021[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Ua[/td]
[td]0.81[/td]
[td]0.868[/td]
[td]+0.058[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Ub[/td]
[td]0.81[/td]
[td]0.834[/td]
[td]+0.024[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]V[/td]
[td]0.94[/td]
[td]1.101[/td]
[td]+0.161[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Y[/td]
[td]1.13[/td]
[td]1.268[/td]
[td]+0.138[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Z[/td]
[td]0.83[/td]
[td]1.034[/td]
[td]+0.203[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Total[/td]
[td]18.98[/td]
[td]21.390[/td]
[td]+2.409[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Mean[/td]
[td]0.904[/td]
[td]1.019[/td]
[td]+0.115[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]

I think you need to work on your timing for some PLLs. If the difference between the stackmat time and actual time is around 0.086 or less then I would consider it pretty good. (0.02+0.066. Resolution of stackmat timer + uncertainty in my timing procedure which is +/- 2 frames (= 2*0.033). Thanks Aronpm). I started counting frames from the time you do more than 45 degrees of the first turn to the the time you do more than 45 degrees for the last turn. I tried to be as lenient as I could be with the frame counting. For E perm I can't see the last turn very well but it's at least 0.73+ without the last turn. For some PLLs, the last turn wasn't quite completed until after you stopped the timer. Also some of the PLLs you typed up are incorrect e.g. N perms, some R perm, some G perm... I hope this was useful...

 

[Julian]

Nice E. My best is 0.66, not sure what Morten's is.

 

[Hazelnut]

[table="width: 500"]
[tr]
[td][/td]
[td]Stackmat time[/td]
[td]Video analysis time[/td]
[td]Difference[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Aa[/td]
[td]0.63[/td]
[td]0.767[/td]
[td]+0.137[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Ab[/td]
[td]0.66[/td]
[td]0.734[/td]
[td]+0.074[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]E[/td]
[td]0.65[/td]
[td]0.834[/td]
[td]+0.184[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]F[/td]
[td]1.18[/td]
[td]1.335[/td]
[td]+0.155[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Ga[/td]
[td]1.18[/td]
[td]1.268[/td]
[td]+0.088[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Gb[/td]
[td]1.08[/td]
[td]1.135[/td]
[td]+0.055[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Gc[/td]
[td]1.16[/td]
[td]1.235[/td]
[td]+0.075[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Gd[/td]
[td]0.97[/td]
[td]1.202[/td]
[td]+0.232[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]H[/td]
[td]0.68[/td]
[td]0.834[/td]
[td]+0.154[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Ja[/td]
[td]0.81[/td]
[td]0.868[/td]
[td]+0.058[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Jb[/td]
[td]0.71[/td]
[td]0.834[/td]
[td]+0.124[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Na[/td]
[td]0.97[/td]
[td]1.034[/td]
[td]+0.064[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Nb[/td]
[td]0.97[/td]
[td]1.101[/td]
[td]+0.131[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Ra[/td]
[td]1.06[/td]
[td]1.168[/td]
[td]+0.108[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Rb[/td]
[td]0.97[/td]
[td]1.135[/td]
[td]+0.165[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]T[/td]
[td]0.78[/td]
[td]0.801[/td]
[td]+0.021[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Ua[/td]
[td]0.81[/td]
[td]0.868[/td]
[td]+0.058[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Ub[/td]
[td]0.81[/td]
[td]0.834[/td]
[td]+0.024[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]V[/td]
[td]0.94[/td]
[td]1.101[/td]
[td]+0.161[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Y[/td]
[td]1.13[/td]
[td]1.268[/td]
[td]+0.138[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Z[/td]
[td]0.83[/td]
[td]1.034[/td]
[td]+0.203[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Total[/td]
[td]18.98[/td]
[td]21.390[/td]
[td]2.409[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Mean[/td]
[td]0.904[/td]
[td]1.019[/td]
[td]0.115[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]

I think you need to work on your timing for some PLLs. If the difference between the stackmat time and actual time is around 0.05 or less then I would consider it pretty good. I started counting frames from the time you do more than 45 degrees of the first turn to the the time you do more than 45 degrees for the last turn. I tried to be as lenient as I could be with the frame counting. For E perm I can't see the last turn very well but it's at least 0.73+ without the last turn. For some PLLs, the last turn wasn't quite completed until after you stopped the timer. Also some of the PLLs you typed up are incorrect e.g. N perms, some R perm, some G perm... I hope this was useful...

Hmm, to be completely honest, I knew for sure that some plls, I kinda stopped the timer too quickly. (Gc, Ja and maybe even E)

I compared my video to some of the other sub 1 PLL videos and I didn't notice a huge difference in the stopping time for most of the PLLs.

Can in also be that I turn the cube when the timer didn't even start or is it always the stopping that creates the huge differences?

 

[Robert-Y]

Can in also be that I turn the cube when the timer didn't even start or is it always the stopping that creates the huge differences?

I think it's a mixture of both, but perhaps it's mostly your start.

EDIT: Oh btw I think the T perm might be a youtube UWR... I could be wrong though

 

[cubernya]

I think it's a mixture of both, but perhaps it's mostly your start.

EDIT: Oh btw I think the T perm might be a youtube UWR... I could be wrong though

I think someone timed Rowe's T perm at 0.73 on an official solve

 

[Stefan]

How about a PLL attack?

 

[Hazelnut]

I think it's a mixture of both, but perhaps it's mostly your start.

EDIT: Oh btw I think the T perm might be a youtube UWR... I could be wrong though

Okay, on the next video, I'll try to keep in mind of the starts and stops. Huge thanks for the detailed analysis

on all the cases. I'll redo some of the ones I didn't sub 1 completely.

Also, My PB for T perm is 0.69. I guess that's questionable as well haha

How about a PLL attack?

Will do! Since you can't really "cheat" on a PLL time attack, I'll try to get a decent one up.
My best is 33 but I could easily lower if I change the sequence because I seemed to lock up a lot on one transition.
Ex Ja to V bleh

EDIT: I have 30.36 now with better sequence on video with crappy angle :/ I put it up on youtube.