• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 35,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!

[NAR] 9.30 OH Single - Neil Morales

vcuber13

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2009
Messages
2,478
Location
Near Toronto
WCA
2009METH01
YouTube
Visit Channel
Hey Thanks everyone idk how to multi quote/reply but yeah JackJ is right I was referring to the 2nd round and I locked up pretty bad on one of my first round solves which could've easily been a 13 or high 12.
Next to the Reply with Quote there is a quote with a plus, click that and it will add it to the reply.

Great solve!
 

uberCuber

Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
3,921
Location
Tucson, Arizona, USA
WCA
2011THOM01
Hey Thanks everyone idk how to multi quote/reply but yeah JackJ is right I was referring to the 2nd round and I locked up pretty bad on one of my first round solves which could've easily been a 13 or high 12.
I'm sure that DNF first solve didn't help your nerves in the final...that was another timer malfunction wasn't it? Way too many of those were happening all day >_>
 
Joined
Nov 8, 2010
Messages
5,472
Location
near Ottawa, Canada
WCA
2010CANT02
YouTube
Visit Channel
Yeah ZZ and ZBLL
I don't want to sound negative, but it please call this 2GLL. It annoys me when people when people say that they used an alg from a huge set, when the same alg is also part of a smaller set (like someone getting OLL skip and PLL saying they did 1LLL) or doing an alg which happened to skip another step, and saying you use a method that solves both steps at a time (like doing OLL and happening to solve the corners, then saying you did OLLCP) just to make them look cool, like they know lots of algs. I used to be guily of this, but I was told, and completely understand the other's point of view. And hopefully this actually is 2GLL, and not COLL and EP skip or OLL and PLL skip because that would be even worse.

Sincerely,

People who know lots of algs.
 
Last edited:

RubiXer

Member
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
182
Location
So Cal
WCA
2012MORA05
I don't want to sound negative, but it please call this 2GLL. It annoys me when people when people say that they used an alg from a huge set, when the same alg is also part of a smaller set (like someone getting OLL skip and PLL saying they did 1LLL) or doing an alg which happened to skip another step, and saying you use a method that solves both steps at a time (like doing OLL and happening to solve the corners, then saying you did OLLCP) just to make them look cool, like they know lots of algs. I used to be guily of this, but I was told, and completely understand the other's point of view. And hopefully this actually is 2GLL, and not COLL and EP skip or OLL and PLL skip because that would be even worse.

Sincerely,

People who know lots of algs.
Ok
Brilliant reaction congrats :)
Thanks :)
 
Top