Good day,
I recently got a 2x2 and I've been looking around to select the method that fits me and my needs the most. I wanna be able to get goods solves, without being sub 3.... From what I saw, CCL is pretty good, but requires a lot of algo and the recognition may take a long time. I also read about Ortega and Guimond, Ortega seams easier to learn, recognition is easier and times are slightly higher.
So my Questions would be: Should I only learn Ortega or learn Ortega+Guimond because they are good complement? Also, would only learning CLL be more efficient/easier than Ortega+Guimond? Finally, Andy Klise made good PDF for these 3 methods, but are they relatively good algs or I should consider another source? (http://www.kungfoomanchu.com/home.html#222)
On a last note, I am currently using CFOP( average of low 20) and I am now trying to pratice Roux...but didnt work on CMLL yet.
Thanks,
I recently got a 2x2 and I've been looking around to select the method that fits me and my needs the most. I wanna be able to get goods solves, without being sub 3.... From what I saw, CCL is pretty good, but requires a lot of algo and the recognition may take a long time. I also read about Ortega and Guimond, Ortega seams easier to learn, recognition is easier and times are slightly higher.
So my Questions would be: Should I only learn Ortega or learn Ortega+Guimond because they are good complement? Also, would only learning CLL be more efficient/easier than Ortega+Guimond? Finally, Andy Klise made good PDF for these 3 methods, but are they relatively good algs or I should consider another source? (http://www.kungfoomanchu.com/home.html#222)
On a last note, I am currently using CFOP( average of low 20) and I am now trying to pratice Roux...but didnt work on CMLL yet.
Thanks,