• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 35,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!

2-look PLL puzzle

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Oct 8, 2006
Messages
914
Likes
15
Location
Malden, MA, USA
WCA
2006NORS01
YouTube
cuBerBruce
#21
Which 58 does it hit?
For the specific case I mentioned, where you use T-Perm and one U-Perm, all cases can be solved in two alg executions except the F-Perms, N-Perms, V-Perms and Y-Perms.

Using a set of three PLL algs, I found that the most you can solve (with no more than 2 alg executions) is 71 out of 72 cases. (I'm basing the PLL names from the speedsolving.com Wiki page.) For example, with Ga, Ab, and Jb; you can solve all cases in 2 alg executions except Nb. So Ga, Ab, Jb, and Nb will solve all. So it appears to me that 4 is the smallest number of PLL algs that can be used to solve any PLL with at most 2 alg executions.

I calculated 16 cases where 71 out of 72 cases can be solved. Pick any G-Perm, any U- or A-Perm, and then some J- or R-Perm will allow you to reach 71 out of 72 cases with no more than 2 alg executions.
 
Joined
Nov 2, 2008
Messages
101
Likes
0
Location
Vancouver, Canada
Thread starter #22
Which 58 does it hit?
For the specific case I mentioned, where you use T-Perm and one U-Perm, all cases can be solved in two alg executions except the F-Perms, N-Perms, V-Perms and Y-Perms.

Using a set of three PLL algs, I found that the most you can solve (with no more than 2 alg executions) is 71 out of 72 cases. (I'm basing the PLL names from the speedsolving.com Wiki page.) For example, with Ga, Ab, and Jb; you can solve all cases in 2 alg executions except Nb. So Ga, Ab, Jb, and Nb will solve all. So it appears to me that 4 is the smallest number of PLL algs that can be used to solve any PLL with at most 2 alg executions.

I calculated 16 cases where 71 out of 72 cases can be solved. Pick any G-Perm, any U- or A-Perm, and then some J- or R-Perm will allow you to reach 71 out of 72 cases with no more than 2 alg executions.
You're doing this on a computer, aren't you?
 
Joined
Oct 8, 2006
Messages
914
Likes
15
Location
Malden, MA, USA
WCA
2006NORS01
YouTube
cuBerBruce
#23
Which 58 does it hit?
For the specific case I mentioned, where you use T-Perm and one U-Perm, all cases can be solved in two alg executions except the F-Perms, N-Perms, V-Perms and Y-Perms.

Using a set of three PLL algs, I found that the most you can solve (with no more than 2 alg executions) is 71 out of 72 cases. (I'm basing the PLL names from the speedsolving.com Wiki page.) For example, with Ga, Ab, and Jb; you can solve all cases in 2 alg executions except Nb. So Ga, Ab, Jb, and Nb will solve all. So it appears to me that 4 is the smallest number of PLL algs that can be used to solve any PLL with at most 2 alg executions.

I calculated 16 cases where 71 out of 72 cases can be solved. Pick any G-Perm, any U- or A-Perm, and then some J- or R-Perm will allow you to reach 71 out of 72 cases with no more than 2 alg executions.
You're doing this on a computer, aren't you?
Yes, I used GAP.
 
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Messages
1,124
Likes
5
Location
Westminster, CO
WCA
2008BRUN01
#25
No, they're not. 2-look means you recognize twice. You can do a 2-look PLL with two algs (A/U) It's not the most efficient, though. More likely you want 2-ALG PLL.

As an example, look at compound OLL ( http://cube.garron.us/algs/compOLL/index.htm )

It is a 1-look, 2 alg OLL system.
I think that's a specious differentiation.

In the common vernacular, "look" implies recognizing the case and applying the appropriate algorithm. If you see a ccwA and perform cwA*2, then you've simply used a sub-optimal algorithm to solve the case.

The standard Y perm is actually a combination of 2 OLLs (37+33), as is the standard T perm (same OLLs, reversed) with a couple of moves cancelled out. By your definition each of those could be definited as two algs.
 
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Messages
2,833
Likes
5
WCA
2008FANW01
YouTube
fanwuq
#26
No, they're not. 2-look means you recognize twice. You can do a 2-look PLL with two algs (A/U) It's not the most efficient, though. More likely you want 2-ALG PLL.

As an example, look at compound OLL ( http://cube.garron.us/algs/compOLL/index.htm )

It is a 1-look, 2 alg OLL system.
I think that's a specious differentiation.

In the common vernacular, "look" implies recognizing the case and applying the appropriate algorithm. If you see a ccwA and perform cwA*2, then you've simply used a sub-optimal algorithm to solve the case.

The standard Y perm is actually a combination of 2 OLLs (37+33), as is the standard T perm (same OLLs, reversed) with a couple of moves cancelled out. By your definition each of those could be definited as two algs.
It's a bit different idea because he is speaking about combining 2 PLLs and the Y perm is 2 OLLs. In that case, you might as well as say the Y perm is made up of 17 single turn algs.

If you use only one A perm and one U perm, it can be 1 look and as many as 2 of the same A and 2 of the same U.

The question here should actually be applying how many distinct permutations of the LL is sufficient to reach all PLL cases. Treat the permutation as the function, not the manual execution of the alg.

Edit:
The title of the thread is actually proper. It is 2 PLL, not 2 alg or 2 look.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Messages
1,124
Likes
5
Location
Westminster, CO
WCA
2008BRUN01
#27
I think my point may have been more clear if I'd quoted his first posting instead of the second. Performing ccwU twice to solve a cwU should be considered a different algorithm from ccwU, there are just shorter cwU algs available.

Maybe it's a moot point.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top