10 Years Ago

[Ltsurge]

I think that's what he was saying too.

The tower was designed to take a plane flight. The plane got embedded into the towers, and didn't effect the tower at all. It's just that the gasoline ignited and started a fire. It was the fire weakening the steel by 50% that made it collapse.

There are tons of conspiracy theories around. I think what the guy was saying was that the fire could never have weakened the steel that much. TBH I'm not going to say whether the attacks were justified or not, but I will say I am sad that so many have lost their lives on both sides of this pretty pointless war.

 

[cubernya]

Hence why the war is called "Waste"

 

[JuGglEr]

I don't want to argue, but I just want you to watch the WTC 7 collapse and tell me what you see : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A . Especially what's that on the right side of the building at 0:02. Then watch videos from controlled demolitions and see if there's a difference. Then think of why almost nobody even mention that on tv.Then ask yourself a question why we only have 5 frames from Pentagon hit and for videos from buildings nearby where all confiscated. Then search the internet and find what connections are between Bush and Bin Laden families, they even went on vacation together. No insults please, I'm just saying.

 

[daniel0731ex]

I think the fire insulation material was shattered from the shockwave of the crash, which exposes the bare steel structure to the fire, thus weakening and collapse as the heat conducts throughout the whole structure.

No insults please,

ur an idiat.

j/k,

this is actually the first time I heard of a conspiracy theory about controlled demolishion (i had no idea of what you guys were talking about in the last page until now). After a quick search on Google, though, it seems to me that the points supporting the theory aren't very convincing.

 

[chrissyD]

It's just that the gasoline ignited and started a fire. It was the fire weakening the steel by 50% that made it collapse.

imagine the weight of the building pressing down on that softened steel. The buildings were designed with planes hitting in mind but its never happened like that before so how do they know the design was right?. The explosions seen when they collapsed would have been the huge shockwave and pressure blowing out the windows when they collapsed.

the only thing that tells me "inside job" is WTC7, it should never of collapsed and also i don't know if this is right but i was told all of the CIA were evacuated from the area hours before the first impact.

I think we need to put the conspiracys in the back of our minds and just think of everyone who has suffered from this.

 

[MalusDB]

http://i.imgur.com/xUkV2.jpg
EDIT: Not trying to say anything bad about anyone, just I don't want anyone thinking that the resultant middles eastern invasion was "glorious" or something.

 

[ianography]

http://i.imgur.com/xUkV2.jpg
EDIT: Not trying to say anything bad about anyone, just I don't want anyone thinking that the resultant middles eastern invasion was "glorious" or something.

Ian likes that picture. Nobody pays attention to the majority of Afghani/Iraqi civilians that had nothing to do with 9/11.

 

[Kirjava]

Honestly, until you can forget about this and move on, the attack was a success.

 

[Muesli]

Honestly, until you can forget about this and move on, the attack was a success.

I was just thinking this earlier. Security is still ridiculous, you can't trust the person sat next to you on a train or bus and a 10 year "War on terror". The 10 year anniversary of this attack only serves to highlight just how big an impact that this caused and how much the west was terrorised by this.

The terrorists seem to have won so far.