Search results

First of all because I've solved all the other edges. Also, all the other stickers besides that one and the one at UF are solved, so process of elimination. I probably would've just glanced to the side and seen the blue sticker, though. Or I could've figured it out at some point while solving...

It's not fast.

Seems really repetitive and drawn out.

Here's a quick example. Scramble (Blue Front, Yellow Top): R U R' F' L' U2 L2 R' F L' R2 U2 R' First thing I notice is the 2 yellow stickers facing me at FL and FU. I orient these With L' U L. Next I see the yellow sticker facing the right at UR and the yellow sticker facing me at FU. I solve...

That is *not* how you should be doing bad edges. First of all, try doing a y rotation and putting the unsolved faces on F and U, I find this easier for recognition. When I do bad edges, I only do 2 edges at a time. Just look for 2 unoriented edges, then orient them. While you're orienting...

Your blocks look fine. Just practise using them in speedsolves I guess. How well does executing bad edges on R and U work for you? I'd think doing a y and doing them on R and U would help recognition in a speedsolve.

U' R U R' U R U' U R2 U' R' U R U' r U' R' U r'

Oh sorry. I didn't really want to waste time reading and entire forum game's thread.

I can join? -9 RyanReese09.

Urgh. I'm having difficult sub-2ing this. How are you guys executing?

I do this for my LL. I generally do a CFOP start, though.

Yea, thinking of it as one time works as well.

Yes, that's what I meant. I don't have trouble mirroring over to LU, I just have trouble executing it with the y and as RU. RU algs are definitely terrible to memorize. Other subsets (RUD, RUL, etc) are so much easier to memorize. To be honest, I don't think RU has much of an advantage over...

4a - I realize this would be difficult. Could we possibly change to using the prefix UL rather than LL? To remove ambiguity between M layer finishes and U layer finishes. e.g. PUL for CFOP, PML for Roux. 5 - This would be super cool. I'd like to see what ideas you have. 7 - Or maybe COLS? I...

Reread the last couple posts of that discussion. I don't think you understand what I was saying (maybe I'm misunderstanding you though). He asked whether it was worth learning new algorithms for the reflections, or if we just used mirrors. I said you might as well learn new algorithms, because...

But you're solving more pieces on the Megaminx than on the 2x2x2. Relays should be thought of as one solve, not as multiple solves.

Work on your centres + 1x3x4. Lookahead during F3L.

Learning the reflections would be eight though, and that's what he was asking about.

If you get an amount of inspection time depending on how many cubes you solve, why don't you get more inspection time for 7x7x7 than for 2x2x2?

YES.