Search results

Yes

I made a reconstruction of the last video, the short where he's wearing that red thing around his neck. First here is the sequence of moves that he did: R2 F2 R U2 R U2 R' F R U R' U' R' F R2 U' // Gc D' R U R' U' D R2 U' R U' R' U R' U R2 U' // Gd D' U' R2 U R' U R' U' R U' R2 D U' R' U R U //...

Cool, thank you! I suppose this thread can be moved/archived or something now!

I was just looking into the history of slice moves, and noticed that the SS Wiki contains a mistake in the explanation of E moves: The E layer moves in the same direction as the D layer. I don't have a seperate account for the Wiki, maybe someone can fix it?

You are doing great, bro!

What I tried recently: Swap the white and yellow centercaps, also swap the red and orange centercap. Reset the cube in the app. From now on scramble with green on front and yellow on top. The app will think white is on top. The cubestate won't match the cube exactly, which is also annoying...

Is this still in the pipeline? The battle mode is practically unusable 90% of the time. It's frustrating to get many solves DNF'd, and waiting all the time really kills the flow.

I've been playing around with the GoCube recently, and really love that cstimer supports the GoCube. I just noticed a weird issue with the times, the thousands aren't accurate. For each possible outcome I counted the number of times it occurs in a sample of 1851 solves, and this is the result...

I have a Dayan PanShi. I barely ever used it, so it's practically new.

If you are talking about the first step of Geatan Guimond's method (without cube rotations): U F' L F' L U' R B' R B' Usually I'll set it up so that I can do R' F R' F, or L F' L F'.

Hi Yellowz, First of all, probably it's possible to get sub 20 with all the algorithms you know now. You are probably spending most of your time looking for pieces and patterns. Yes, I do think learned algorithms help. In general, there's not 1 algorithm for each case, it helps to know more...

NEXT: L' D2 R2 B2 L F2 U2 R' B2 L2 D' F' R' B R' D' L D U' L2 F' Well.. I use CFOP. z2 x R u' L' u2 // Cross U' L' U L U' L' U' L // First pair U R U' R' L U'L' // Second pair U2 R' U2 R U' RUR' // Thrid pair R' U' R U2 y R d' RU'R'F' // Fourth pair U' R2' D' RUR' DR U RU'R'U'R // COLL M...

Yeah, I am Dutch too. I sent you a PM..

Excellent marketing. If it contains magnets, it's cheating.

Here's a playlist from Matt Bahners channel: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLRUznhItCg-V8Wcbqv2GFFQ5Py6hHgfMk

Hi Nikhil Soares, I only designed a puzzle in Solidworks once, so I don't know too much about it. These videos show you the process of designing twisty puzzles in Solidworks: How to pillow a puzzle using Solidworks How to make a Megaminx on Solidworks Twisty Puzzles a la Vi I recommend...

Isn't it possible to just put stickers on the whole cube? (I don't have the new fangshi 2x2, so I don't know if there is a way to feel the logo underneath the sticker, but if you can't feel it, then it shouldn't be a problem)

Allright, this seems to make a lot more sense. I am glad that this is not about something you can see imediately at inspection, which is what I first thought. So to take advantage of this you'll have to know whether you have parity in the first place, and track the cycles like in BLD. To be...

A bit weird to reply to myself, but I also want to explain my reasoning for thinking that this is impossible: Suppose you put a logo on one of the white centers of a 4x4. In any cube state, I can cycle 3 white pieces, to make the logo end up in 4 places (where ever I want the logo to end up)...

I don't really have a very strong opinion about any of this, but what annoys me about this thread is the issue about logo's on 4x4 and 6x6 and parities. I don't understand how a logo can be used to determine anything about parity. I just don't get it. Right now I think it's impossible to use...