Search results

Huh? I'm confused. What's the difference in v-cube 5 compared to Rubik's 5x5x5 if i want to use your method on it?

I needed it only for edges that are swapped but are in the same layer. I hoped that using a T perm but with combination of single and 2 layer turns this would be possible. Anyway to get straight to the point,is it possible to solve any (or all) parity errors on v-cube 5 by simply using logic

I think it's a simple question. Is it possible to fix parity on v-cube 5 simply using set-up moves following by apply of one of PLL algorithms after you (lets say solved but two edge pieces are not solved ofc) a cube?I refer to old pochmann

Can anyone confirm this?

Ah sorry.I use old pochmann.So any of these three can occur at the end?

So,if i don't apply R perm to fix parity on 3x3x3,after solving the edges,am i ALWAYS left with R(a) perm after i solved corners?

I use old Pochmann method,my buffer position for edges is UR while buffer for corners is located on UBL.

Why do i need to fix parity between solving edges and corners?Is there no way to fix it at the very end?For example by memorizing what PLL i performed last

Ok...but how do i memorize the orientation?

I wanted to use same method for corners.But i'm bit confused on how you memo every corner with only one number. I don't know M2/R2 metod.I use old Pochmann. Is it possible to memo corners with your method even if i use old Pochmann? If so,how?

Well it gets better and better.But almost every time i have 2 edges flipped incorrectly.Everything else is solved.I hope i will fix that with time.And practice

I think it could go down to 4-4.5 seconds.And it will be achieved only with faster recognition

I use old pochmann

Yes i know.I wanted to say actually,will i ever have to apply R-perm to fix corners,if they are already solved.That would mean i have odd number of permutations.

Yes it's on 3x3x3.sorry for not mentioning that

Is it possible? I haven't encountered this so i just want to make sure that this is true. So it's impossible to have a parity if i pre-solve a corners?

I think he wants to say that he uses scramble algorithm shown in badmephisto video.It makes first layer already solved.He doesn't solve a cube layer by layer. Maybe it is layer-by-layer solve but it's a lucky coincidence.

As in topic title,i need a scramble algorithm for BLD solve,without cycle breaks. I need this for step-by-step memorization training.And i think that this is the best way? I tried search button but didn't found anything

I was thinking...maybe i shouldn't memorize the pieces that i break a cycle with.If they come at the very end anyway,maybe i should only memorize "break" and pieces that i "broke",memorize at the end?

That's what actually bothers me.I find it hard to remember where did i broke the cycle.And where did that piece moved to.With only one break it's not that hard.But two or more gives me a headache